On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 11:22:40AM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On 03/06/2019 10:38, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > I'm thinking the below can go on top to further clean up?
> >
>
> Yep, that's even better indeed! Want me to resend with that extra diff?
Yes please, I didn't even
On 03/06/2019 10:38, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
[...]
>
> I'm thinking the below can go on top to further clean up?
>
Yep, that's even better indeed! Want me to resend with that extra diff?
[...]
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 11:38, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2019 at 05:41:10PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> > cfs_rq_has_blocked() and others_have_blocked() are only used within
> > update_blocked_averages(). The !CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED version of the
> > latter calls them
On Sun, Jun 02, 2019 at 05:41:10PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> cfs_rq_has_blocked() and others_have_blocked() are only used within
> update_blocked_averages(). The !CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED version of the
> latter calls them within a #define CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON block, whereas
> the
cfs_rq_has_blocked() and others_have_blocked() are only used within
update_blocked_averages(). The !CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED version of the
latter calls them within a #define CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON block, whereas
the CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED one calls them unconditionnally.
As reported by Qian, the
5 matches
Mail list logo