>Perhaps there should be a list_has_more_than_one() API, as list_is_singular
>requires two checks, and the "more_than_one" only requires a single check.
>
>list_is_singular() is:
>
> return !list_empty(list) && (list->next == list->prev);
>
>
>which is more work than what you are
On Tue, 27 Oct 2020 01:41:52 +0800
Hui Su wrote:
> Use the list_is_singular(_se->run_list) api instead of
> 'rt_se->run_list.prev != rt_se->run_list.next'.
> Fix a comment by the way, and make the comment more clearly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hui Su
> ---
> kernel/sched/rt.c | 8
> 1 file
Use the list_is_singular(_se->run_list) api instead of
'rt_se->run_list.prev != rt_se->run_list.next'.
Fix a comment by the way, and make the comment more clearly.
Signed-off-by: Hui Su
---
kernel/sched/rt.c | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git
3 matches
Mail list logo
