On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 01:22:40PM +0530, Preeti Murthy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > (Rik, you authored this patch so it should be sent from you and needs a
> > signed-off assuming people are ok with the changelog.)
> >
> > Thomas Hellstrom bisected a
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 01:22:40PM +0530, Preeti Murthy wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Mel Gorman mgor...@suse.de wrote:
(Rik, you authored this patch so it should be sent from you and needs a
signed-off assuming people are ok with the changelog.)
Thomas Hellstrom bisected
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> (Rik, you authored this patch so it should be sent from you and needs a
> signed-off assuming people are ok with the changelog.)
>
> Thomas Hellstrom bisected a regression where erratic 3D performance is
> experienced on virtual machines as
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Mel Gorman mgor...@suse.de wrote:
(Rik, you authored this patch so it should be sent from you and needs a
signed-off assuming people are ok with the changelog.)
Thomas Hellstrom bisected a regression where erratic 3D performance is
experienced on virtual
On 01/06/2014 07:35 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:39:12AM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
>> wake_affine uses a weight of 0 for sync wakeups on the grounds that it
>> is assuming the waking task will sleep and not contribute to load in the
>> near future. In this case, we still
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 01:34:20PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:39:12AM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > (Rik, you authored this patch so it should be sent from you and needs a
> > signed-off assuming people are ok with the changelog.)
>
> Where did all this take place? I
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:39:12AM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> wake_affine uses a weight of 0 for sync wakeups on the grounds that it
> is assuming the waking task will sleep and not contribute to load in the
> near future. In this case, we still want to calculate the effective load
> of the sched
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:39:12AM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> (Rik, you authored this patch so it should be sent from you and needs a
> signed-off assuming people are ok with the changelog.)
Where did all this take place? I saw the initial email I think but then
nothing..
Not that I was reading
(Rik, you authored this patch so it should be sent from you and needs a
signed-off assuming people are ok with the changelog.)
Thomas Hellstrom bisected a regression where erratic 3D performance is
experienced on virtual machines as measured by glxgears. It identified
commit 58d081b5 (sched/numa:
(Rik, you authored this patch so it should be sent from you and needs a
signed-off assuming people are ok with the changelog.)
Thomas Hellstrom bisected a regression where erratic 3D performance is
experienced on virtual machines as measured by glxgears. It identified
commit 58d081b5 (sched/numa:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:39:12AM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
(Rik, you authored this patch so it should be sent from you and needs a
signed-off assuming people are ok with the changelog.)
Where did all this take place? I saw the initial email I think but then
nothing..
Not that I was reading
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:39:12AM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
wake_affine uses a weight of 0 for sync wakeups on the grounds that it
is assuming the waking task will sleep and not contribute to load in the
near future. In this case, we still want to calculate the effective load
of the sched
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 01:34:20PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:39:12AM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
(Rik, you authored this patch so it should be sent from you and needs a
signed-off assuming people are ok with the changelog.)
Where did all this take place? I saw
On 01/06/2014 07:35 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:39:12AM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
wake_affine uses a weight of 0 for sync wakeups on the grounds that it
is assuming the waking task will sleep and not contribute to load in the
near future. In this case, we still want to
14 matches
Mail list logo