Re: [PATCH] sched: dynamically update the root-domain span/online maps

* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i'm reluctant to apply it without test results, unless we have a > > very clear picture of what happened on Andrew's box and how this > > updated patch resolves that problem. (or once Andrew tests your > > patch and deems it OK.) > > hm, due

Re: [PATCH] sched: dynamically update the root-domain span/online maps

Ingo Molnar wrote: well since i reverted the original patch, there's no regression. The question is, do we know whether this new patch works fine wrt. s2ram? Hi Ingo, I included the same patches into 2.6.23.9-rt13 and someone reported s2r failed for them. I've included Greg's updates into

Re: [PATCH] sched: dynamically update the root-domain span/online maps

On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:48:00 +0100 Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Gregory Haskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm-commits=119793598429477=2 > > > > I have confirmed that it builds and boots clean, and it passes > > checkpatch. However, my test

Re: [PATCH] sched: dynamically update the root-domain span/online maps

* Gregory Haskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Steven, > I posted a suspend-to-ram fix to sched-devel earlier today: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/17/445 > > This fix should also be applied to -rt as I introduced the same > regression there. Here is a version of the fix for 23-rt13.

Re: [PATCH] sched: dynamically update the root-domain span/online maps

* Gregory Haskins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm-commits=119793598429477=2 > > I have confirmed that it builds and boots clean, and it passes > checkpatch. However, my test machine seems to be having problems with > suspend-to-ram that are unrelated to this patch

Re: [PATCH] sched: dynamically update the root-domain span/online maps

* Gregory Haskins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm-commitsm=119793598429477w=2 I have confirmed that it builds and boots clean, and it passes checkpatch. However, my test machine seems to be having problems with suspend-to-ram that are unrelated to this patch that

Re: [PATCH] sched: dynamically update the root-domain span/online maps

* Gregory Haskins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Steven, I posted a suspend-to-ram fix to sched-devel earlier today: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/17/445 This fix should also be applied to -rt as I introduced the same regression there. Here is a version of the fix for 23-rt13. I can

Re: [PATCH] sched: dynamically update the root-domain span/online maps

On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:48:00 +0100 Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Gregory Haskins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm-commitsm=119793598429477w=2 I have confirmed that it builds and boots clean, and it passes checkpatch. However, my test machine seems to

Re: [PATCH] sched: dynamically update the root-domain span/online maps

Ingo Molnar wrote: well since i reverted the original patch, there's no regression. The question is, do we know whether this new patch works fine wrt. s2ram? Hi Ingo, I included the same patches into 2.6.23.9-rt13 and someone reported s2r failed for them. I've included Greg's updates into

Re: [PATCH] sched: dynamically update the root-domain span/online maps

* Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i'm reluctant to apply it without test results, unless we have a very clear picture of what happened on Andrew's box and how this updated patch resolves that problem. (or once Andrew tests your patch and deems it OK.) wades through a pile of

Re: [PATCH] sched: dynamically update the root-domain span/online maps

Gregory Haskins wrote: Hi Steven, I posted a suspend-to-ram fix to sched-devel earlier today: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/17/445 This fix should also be applied to -rt as I introduced the same regression there. Here is a version of the fix for 23-rt13. I can submit a version for

[PATCH] sched: dynamically update the root-domain span/online maps

Hi Steven, I posted a suspend-to-ram fix to sched-devel earlier today: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/17/445 This fix should also be applied to -rt as I introduced the same regression there. Here is a version of the fix for 23-rt13. I can submit a version for 24-rc5-rt1 at your request.

[PATCH] sched: dynamically update the root-domain span/online maps

Hi Ingo, The following patch applies to sched-devel to replace the root-domain patch that was reverted as noted here: http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm-commits=119793598429477=2 I have confirmed that it builds and boots clean, and it passes checkpatch. However, my test machine seems to be

[PATCH] sched: dynamically update the root-domain span/online maps

Hi Ingo, The following patch applies to sched-devel to replace the root-domain patch that was reverted as noted here: http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm-commitsm=119793598429477w=2 I have confirmed that it builds and boots clean, and it passes checkpatch. However, my test machine seems to be

[PATCH] sched: dynamically update the root-domain span/online maps

Hi Steven, I posted a suspend-to-ram fix to sched-devel earlier today: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/17/445 This fix should also be applied to -rt as I introduced the same regression there. Here is a version of the fix for 23-rt13. I can submit a version for 24-rc5-rt1 at your request.

Re: [PATCH] sched: dynamically update the root-domain span/online maps

Gregory Haskins wrote: Hi Steven, I posted a suspend-to-ram fix to sched-devel earlier today: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/17/445 This fix should also be applied to -rt as I introduced the same regression there. Here is a version of the fix for 23-rt13. I can submit a version for