On 13/04/2021 18:28, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 10:36:07 +0200
> Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
[...]
>> Add a
>>
>> Fixes: 55627e3cd22c ("sched/core: Remove rq->cpu_load[]")
>>
>> line.
>
> It's just removing a comment. Should it really need a "Fixes" tag, which
> will cause many
On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 10:36:07 +0200
Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> > @@ -897,11 +897,6 @@ DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sched_uclamp_used);
> > struct rq {
> > /* runqueue lock: */
> > raw_spinlock_t lock;
> > -
> > - /*
> > -* nr_running and cpu_load should be in the same cacheline
On 12/04/2021 09:39, Hui Su wrote:
> Since the commit 55627e3cd22c ("sched/core: Remove rq->cpu_load[]"),
> we don't need this any more.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hui Su
> ---
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 5 -
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h
Since the commit 55627e3cd22c ("sched/core: Remove rq->cpu_load[]"),
we don't need this any more.
Signed-off-by: Hui Su
---
kernel/sched/sched.h | 5 -
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 10a1522b1e30..2232022d8561 100644
---
4 matches
Mail list logo