Re: [PATCH] security: replace FSF address with web source in license notices

2017-11-20 Thread Paul Moore
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 5:10 AM, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > A few years ago the FSF moved and "59 Temple Place" is wrong. Having this > still in our source files feels old and unmaintained. > > Let's take the license statement serious and not confuse users. > > As

Re: [PATCH] security: replace FSF address with web source in license notices

2017-11-20 Thread Paul Moore
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 5:10 AM, Martin Kepplinger wrote: > A few years ago the FSF moved and "59 Temple Place" is wrong. Having this > still in our source files feels old and unmaintained. > > Let's take the license statement serious and not confuse users. > > As

Re: [PATCH] security: replace FSF address with web source in license notices

2017-11-14 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
Quoting Martin Kepplinger (mart...@posteo.de): > A few years ago the FSF moved and "59 Temple Place" is wrong. Having this > still in our source files feels old and unmaintained. > > Let's take the license statement serious and not confuse users. > > As

Re: [PATCH] security: replace FSF address with web source in license notices

2017-11-14 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
Quoting Martin Kepplinger (mart...@posteo.de): > A few years ago the FSF moved and "59 Temple Place" is wrong. Having this > still in our source files feels old and unmaintained. > > Let's take the license statement serious and not confuse users. > > As

[PATCH] security: replace FSF address with web source in license notices

2017-11-14 Thread Martin Kepplinger
A few years ago the FSF moved and "59 Temple Place" is wrong. Having this still in our source files feels old and unmaintained. Let's take the license statement serious and not confuse users. As https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html suggests, we replace the postal address with

[PATCH] security: replace FSF address with web source in license notices

2017-11-14 Thread Martin Kepplinger
A few years ago the FSF moved and "59 Temple Place" is wrong. Having this still in our source files feels old and unmaintained. Let's take the license statement serious and not confuse users. As https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html suggests, we replace the postal address with