On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 08:44:50AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> +Felipe
>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Alexander Savchenko
> wrote:
> > From: Ruchika Kharwar
> >
> > Ensure the Interrupt handling routine return IRQ_HANDLED vs
> > IRQ_NONE.
>
> Why?
>
> By unconditionally returning
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 07:30:19AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Greg,
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> > +Felipe
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Alexander Savchenko
> > wrote:
> >> From: Ruchika Kharwar
> >>
> >> Ensure the Interrupt handling routine
Greg,
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> +Felipe
>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Alexander Savchenko
> wrote:
>> From: Ruchika Kharwar
>>
>> Ensure the Interrupt handling routine return IRQ_HANDLED vs
>> IRQ_NONE.
>
> Why?
>
> By unconditionally returning IRQ_HANDLED,
Greg,
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org wrote:
+Felipe
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Alexander Savchenko
oleksandr.savche...@ti.com wrote:
From: Ruchika Kharwar ruch...@ti.com
Ensure the Interrupt handling routine return IRQ_HANDLED vs
IRQ_NONE.
Why?
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 07:30:19AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Greg,
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Kevin Hilman khil...@linaro.org wrote:
+Felipe
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Alexander Savchenko
oleksandr.savche...@ti.com wrote:
From: Ruchika Kharwar ruch...@ti.com
Ensure
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 08:44:50AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
+Felipe
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Alexander Savchenko
oleksandr.savche...@ti.com wrote:
From: Ruchika Kharwar ruch...@ti.com
Ensure the Interrupt handling routine return IRQ_HANDLED vs
IRQ_NONE.
Why?
By
+Felipe
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Alexander Savchenko
wrote:
> From: Ruchika Kharwar
>
> Ensure the Interrupt handling routine return IRQ_HANDLED vs
> IRQ_NONE.
Why?
By unconditionally returning IRQ_HANDLED, this patch will surely break
systems where the UART IRQ is shared with other
+Felipe
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Alexander Savchenko
oleksandr.savche...@ti.com wrote:
From: Ruchika Kharwar ruch...@ti.com
Ensure the Interrupt handling routine return IRQ_HANDLED vs
IRQ_NONE.
Why?
By unconditionally returning IRQ_HANDLED, this patch will surely break
systems where
From: Ruchika Kharwar
Ensure the Interrupt handling routine return IRQ_HANDLED vs
IRQ_NONE.
Signed-off-by: Ruchika Kharwar
Signed-off-by: Alexander Savchenko
---
drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c |4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
From: Ruchika Kharwar ruch...@ti.com
Ensure the Interrupt handling routine return IRQ_HANDLED vs
IRQ_NONE.
Signed-off-by: Ruchika Kharwar ruch...@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Alexander Savchenko oleksandr.savche...@ti.com
---
drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c |4 +---
1 file changed, 1
10 matches
Mail list logo