On 4/12/21, Erwan LE RAY wrote:
> Hi Dillon,
>
> Thanks for your patch.
>
> Could you please elaborate the use case in your commit message ?
Sorry, local_irq_save() plus spin_lock() same to spin_lock_irqsave()
There is no deadlock . Please ignore this patch.
Thanks
Dillon
>
> Best Regards,
Hi Dillon,
Thanks for your patch.
Could you please elaborate the use case in your commit message ?
Best Regards, Erwan.
On 4/12/21 10:54 AM, dillon min wrote:
Hi Greg,
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 4:25 PM Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 02:50:20PM +0800, dillon min wrote:
Hi Greg,
Hi Greg,
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 4:25 PM Greg KH wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 02:50:20PM +0800, dillon min wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > Thanks for the quick response, please ignore the last private mail.
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 1:52 PM Greg KH wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 12,
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 02:50:20PM +0800, dillon min wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Thanks for the quick response, please ignore the last private mail.
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 1:52 PM Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 12:34:21PM +0800, dillon.min...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > From: dillon
Hi lkp,
Thanks for the reminder.
I just noticed this from greg's mail. still waiting for his response
about the proper solution for this patch.
After that i will update version 2 for it.
Your test is really efficient, thanks.
Best regards,
Dillon.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 3:25 PM kernel test
Hi,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on stm32/stm32-next]
[also build test WARNING on usb/usb-testing v5.12-rc7]
[cannot apply to tty/tty-testing next-20210409]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when
Hi Greg,
Thanks for the quick response, please ignore the last private mail.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 1:52 PM Greg KH wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 12:34:21PM +0800, dillon.min...@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: dillon min
> >
> > To avoid potential deadlock in spin_lock usage, change to use
>
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 12:34:21PM +0800, dillon.min...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: dillon min
>
> To avoid potential deadlock in spin_lock usage, change to use
> spin_lock_irqsave(), spin_unlock_irqrestore() in process(thread_fn) context.
> spin_lock(), spin_unlock() under handler context.
>
>
From: dillon min
To avoid potential deadlock in spin_lock usage, change to use
spin_lock_irqsave(), spin_unlock_irqrestore() in process(thread_fn) context.
spin_lock(), spin_unlock() under handler context.
remove unused local_irq_save/restore call.
Signed-off-by: dillon min
---
Was verified
9 matches
Mail list logo