Re: [PATCH] shmem and simple const super_operations

2007-03-01 Thread Josef Sipek
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 07:22:32PM +, Hugh Dickins wrote: > shmem's super_operations were missed from the recent const-ification; > and simple_fill_super()'s, which can share with get_sb_pseudo()'s. > > Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Acked-by: Josef 'Jeff' Sipek <[EMAIL

[PATCH] shmem and simple const super_operations

2007-03-01 Thread Hugh Dickins
shmem's super_operations were missed from the recent const-ification; and simple_fill_super()'s, which can share with get_sb_pseudo()'s. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- fs/libfs.c | 10 ++ mm/shmem.c |4 ++-- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

[PATCH] shmem and simple const super_operations

2007-03-01 Thread Hugh Dickins
shmem's super_operations were missed from the recent const-ification; and simple_fill_super()'s, which can share with get_sb_pseudo()'s. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- fs/libfs.c | 10 ++ mm/shmem.c |4 ++-- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) ---

Re: [PATCH] shmem and simple const super_operations

2007-03-01 Thread Josef Sipek
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 07:22:32PM +, Hugh Dickins wrote: shmem's super_operations were missed from the recent const-ification; and simple_fill_super()'s, which can share with get_sb_pseudo()'s. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Josef 'Jeff' Sipek [EMAIL PROTECTED]