> On Jan 18, 2017, at 7:54 AM, David Rientjes wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2017, kwon wrote:
>
diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
index 1dfc209..2d30ace 100644
--- a/mm/slab_common.c
+++ b/mm/slab_common.c
@@ -744,7 +744,7 @@ void kmem_cache_destroy(struct km
On Tue, 17 Jan 2017, kwon wrote:
> >> diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
> >> index 1dfc209..2d30ace 100644
> >> --- a/mm/slab_common.c
> >> +++ b/mm/slab_common.c
> >> @@ -744,7 +744,7 @@ void kmem_cache_destroy(struct kmem_cache *s)
> >>bool need_rcu_barrier = false;
> >>in
> On Jan 17, 2017, at 10:33 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 04:04:59PM +0900, Kyunghwan Kwon wrote:
>> The first kmem_cache created at booting up is supposed neither mergeable
>> nor destroyable but was possible to destroy. So prevent it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kyunghwan Kwon
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 04:04:59PM +0900, Kyunghwan Kwon wrote:
> The first kmem_cache created at booting up is supposed neither mergeable
> nor destroyable but was possible to destroy. So prevent it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kyunghwan Kwon
> ---
> mm/slab_common.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertio
The first kmem_cache created at booting up is supposed neither mergeable
nor destroyable but was possible to destroy. So prevent it.
Signed-off-by: Kyunghwan Kwon
---
mm/slab_common.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
index 1d
5 matches
Mail list logo