On 11/28/2013 9:16 AM, jarkko.sakki...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Jarkko Sakkinen
>
> This is a regression caused by f7112e6c. When either subject or
> object is not found the answer for access should be no. This
> patch fixes the situation. '0' is written back instead of failing
> with
On 11/28/2013 9:16 AM, jarkko.sakki...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Jarkko Sakkinen jarkko.sakki...@linux.intel.com
This is a regression caused by f7112e6c. When either subject or
object is not found the answer for access should be no. This
patch fixes the situation. '0' is written back
From: Jarkko Sakkinen
This is a regression caused by f7112e6c. When either subject or
object is not found the answer for access should be no. This
patch fixes the situation. '0' is written back instead of failing
with -EINVAL.
v2: cosmetic style fixes
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen
---
From: Jarkko Sakkinen jarkko.sakki...@linux.intel.com
This is a regression caused by f7112e6c. When either subject or
object is not found the answer for access should be no. This
patch fixes the situation. '0' is written back instead of failing
with -EINVAL.
v2: cosmetic style fixes
4 matches
Mail list logo