08.01.2015 13:58, Thierry Reding пишет:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 12:42:47PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 08.01.2015 11:49, Thierry Reding пишет:
>>> I don't like changing this back to syscore_ops since it makes things
>>> less easier to follow. I also don't think that using PMC_SCRATCH41 for
>
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 12:42:47PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 08.01.2015 11:49, Thierry Reding пишет:
> > I don't like changing this back to syscore_ops since it makes things
> > less easier to follow. I also don't think that using PMC_SCRATCH41 for
> > two different purposes is a good thing.
08.01.2015 11:49, Thierry Reding пишет:
> I don't like changing this back to syscore_ops since it makes things
> less easier to follow. I also don't think that using PMC_SCRATCH41 for
> two different purposes is a good thing. There are a couple of
> suggestions in my reply to your original patch. C
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 06:24:39PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 07.01.2015 17:33, Thierry Reding пишет:
> > On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 10:36:50PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> >>
> >> Tegra SoCs with 64-bit ARM support don't currently support deep CPU
> >> low-power states in mainline Linux. When
07.01.2015 18:24, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
> For now there is no feedback for my suspend bug patch (other than for V1),
> but,
>
To be more correct, by V1 I meant http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/423224/
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the
07.01.2015 17:33, Thierry Reding пишет:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 10:36:50PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>>
>> Tegra SoCs with 64-bit ARM support don't currently support deep CPU
>> low-power states in mainline Linux. When this support is added in the
>> future, it will probably look rather differ
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 10:36:50PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>
> Tegra SoCs with 64-bit ARM support don't currently support deep CPU
> low-power states in mainline Linux. When this support is added in the
> future, it will probably look rather different from the existing
> 32-bit ARM support, s
Hello Thierry
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 10:36:50PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> >
> > Tegra SoCs with 64-bit ARM support don't currently support deep CPU
> > low-power states in mainline Linux. When this support is added in the
> > future, it will pro
On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 10:36:50PM +, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>
> Tegra SoCs with 64-bit ARM support don't currently support deep CPU
> low-power states in mainline Linux. When this support is added in the
> future, it will probably look rather different from the existing
> 32-bit ARM support, s
Tegra SoCs with 64-bit ARM support don't currently support deep CPU
low-power states in mainline Linux. When this support is added in the
future, it will probably look rather different from the existing
32-bit ARM support, since the ARM64 maintainers' strong preference is
to use PSCI to implement
10 matches
Mail list logo
