On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 01:19:33AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> Petru Paler writes:
> > Trying to compile 2.4.0-ac8 resulted in an error about
> > storage size of variable d not being known (I don't have the
> > exact error at hand, the network connectivity to that server
> > is down right
Petru Paler writes:
> Trying to compile 2.4.0-ac8 resulted in an error about
> storage size of variable d not being known (I don't have the
> exact error at hand, the network connectivity to that server
> is down right now). Changing it to dqblk32 got it to compile.
>
> Am I doing
Petru Paler writes:
Trying to compile 2.4.0-ac8 resulted in an error about
storage size of variable d not being known (I don't have the
exact error at hand, the network connectivity to that server
is down right now). Changing it to dqblk32 got it to compile.
Am I doing something
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 01:19:33AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
Petru Paler writes:
Trying to compile 2.4.0-ac8 resulted in an error about
storage size of variable d not being known (I don't have the
exact error at hand, the network connectivity to that server
is down right now).
> What does this fix? Things compile just fine without
> it and looking at the code it was intended to be of
> the original type.
2.4.0-ac has quota fixes (there are bad quota races in 2.4.0) and changes
to support 32bit uid. They aren't in the sparc64 diffs yet and until Linus
has the major
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 02:55:42PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> Petru Paler writes:
> > - struct dqblk d;
> > + struct dqblk32 d;
>
> What does this fix? Things compile just fine without
> it and looking at the code it was intended to be of
> the original type.
>
> Please
Petru Paler writes:
> - struct dqblk d;
> + struct dqblk32 d;
What does this fix? Things compile just fine without
it and looking at the code it was intended to be of
the original type.
Please explain exactly what submitted patches fix in
the future, thanks.
Later,
David S.
--- arch/sparc64/kernel/sys_sparc32.c.orig Sat Jan 13 07:59:43 2001
+++ arch/sparc64/kernel/sys_sparc32.c Sat Jan 13 08:00:23 2001
@@ -904,7 +904,7 @@
{
int cmds = cmd >> SUBCMDSHIFT;
int err;
- struct dqblk d;
+ struct dqblk32 d;
mm_segment_t old_fs;
--- arch/sparc64/kernel/sys_sparc32.c.orig Sat Jan 13 07:59:43 2001
+++ arch/sparc64/kernel/sys_sparc32.c Sat Jan 13 08:00:23 2001
@@ -904,7 +904,7 @@
{
int cmds = cmd SUBCMDSHIFT;
int err;
- struct dqblk d;
+ struct dqblk32 d;
mm_segment_t old_fs;
Petru Paler writes:
- struct dqblk d;
+ struct dqblk32 d;
What does this fix? Things compile just fine without
it and looking at the code it was intended to be of
the original type.
Please explain exactly what submitted patches fix in
the future, thanks.
Later,
David S.
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 02:55:42PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
Petru Paler writes:
- struct dqblk d;
+ struct dqblk32 d;
What does this fix? Things compile just fine without
it and looking at the code it was intended to be of
the original type.
Please explain exactly
What does this fix? Things compile just fine without
it and looking at the code it was intended to be of
the original type.
2.4.0-ac has quota fixes (there are bad quota races in 2.4.0) and changes
to support 32bit uid. They aren't in the sparc64 diffs yet and until Linus
has the major bugs
12 matches
Mail list logo
