On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 01:25:44PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 06:48:33PM -0500, Michael Welling wrote:
>
> > So after reverting this patch I found there is a issue in that it is
> > difficult
> > to determine when a transfer is complete to properly drive the chipselect
>
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 06:48:33PM -0500, Michael Welling wrote:
> So after reverting this patch I found there is a issue in that it is difficult
> to determine when a transfer is complete to properly drive the chipselect from
> within the transfer_one function.
Is unprepare_message() a suitable
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 06:48:33PM -0500, Michael Welling wrote:
So after reverting this patch I found there is a issue in that it is difficult
to determine when a transfer is complete to properly drive the chipselect from
within the transfer_one function.
Is unprepare_message() a suitable
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 01:25:44PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 06:48:33PM -0500, Michael Welling wrote:
So after reverting this patch I found there is a issue in that it is
difficult
to determine when a transfer is complete to properly drive the chipselect
from
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:16:38PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 04:04:11PM -0500, Michael Welling wrote:
>
> > Do you want to revert the patch and apply a new one or should I provide a
> > patch that reverts the changes and fixes it all in one?
>
> Can you please send me
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 04:04:11PM -0500, Michael Welling wrote:
> Do you want to revert the patch and apply a new one or should I provide a
> patch that reverts the changes and fixes it all in one?
Can you please send me separate revert and re-add patches, that's
probably going to be easier to
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:18:57AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 09:07:09PM -0500, Michael Welling wrote:
>
> > My guess is that the set_cs needs to be called even when toggling as GPIO.
>
> > How should I handle this?
>
> It shouldn't be part of a set_cs() operation but
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 09:07:09PM -0500, Michael Welling wrote:
> My guess is that the set_cs needs to be called even when toggling as GPIO.
> How should I handle this?
It shouldn't be part of a set_cs() operation but rather part of the main
transfer operation.
signature.asc
Description:
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 04:04:11PM -0500, Michael Welling wrote:
Do you want to revert the patch and apply a new one or should I provide a
patch that reverts the changes and fixes it all in one?
Can you please send me separate revert and re-add patches, that's
probably going to be easier to
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:18:57AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 09:07:09PM -0500, Michael Welling wrote:
My guess is that the set_cs needs to be called even when toggling as GPIO.
How should I handle this?
It shouldn't be part of a set_cs() operation but rather part
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 09:07:09PM -0500, Michael Welling wrote:
My guess is that the set_cs needs to be called even when toggling as GPIO.
How should I handle this?
It shouldn't be part of a set_cs() operation but rather part of the main
transfer operation.
signature.asc
Description:
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:16:38PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 04:04:11PM -0500, Michael Welling wrote:
Do you want to revert the patch and apply a new one or should I provide a
patch that reverts the changes and fixes it all in one?
Can you please send me separate
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 08:17:58PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 12:38:57PM -0500, Michael Welling wrote:
> > GPIO chip select patch series appears to have broken the native chip select
> > support. This patch pulls the manual native chip select toggling out of
> > the
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 08:17:58PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 12:38:57PM -0500, Michael Welling wrote:
GPIO chip select patch series appears to have broken the native chip select
support. This patch pulls the manual native chip select toggling out of
the transfer_one
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 12:38:57PM -0500, Michael Welling wrote:
> GPIO chip select patch series appears to have broken the native chip select
> support. This patch pulls the manual native chip select toggling out of
> the transfer_one routine and adds a set_cs routine.
Applied, thanks
On 05/12/2015 02:19 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 01:57:36PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> On 05/12/2015 12:38 PM, Michael Welling wrote:
>>> GPIO chip select patch series appears to have broken the native chip select
>>> support. This patch pulls the manual native chip select
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 01:57:36PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 05/12/2015 12:38 PM, Michael Welling wrote:
> > GPIO chip select patch series appears to have broken the native chip select
> > support. This patch pulls the manual native chip select toggling out of
> > the transfer_one routine
On 05/12/2015 12:38 PM, Michael Welling wrote:
> GPIO chip select patch series appears to have broken the native chip select
> support. This patch pulls the manual native chip select toggling out of
> the transfer_one routine and adds a set_cs routine.
>
> Tested natively on AM3354 with SPI
GPIO chip select patch series appears to have broken the native chip select
support. This patch pulls the manual native chip select toggling out of
the transfer_one routine and adds a set_cs routine.
Tested natively on AM3354 with SPI serial flash on spi0cs0.
Signed-off-by: Michael Welling
---
GPIO chip select patch series appears to have broken the native chip select
support. This patch pulls the manual native chip select toggling out of
the transfer_one routine and adds a set_cs routine.
Tested natively on AM3354 with SPI serial flash on spi0cs0.
Signed-off-by: Michael Welling
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 12:38:57PM -0500, Michael Welling wrote:
GPIO chip select patch series appears to have broken the native chip select
support. This patch pulls the manual native chip select toggling out of
the transfer_one routine and adds a set_cs routine.
Applied, thanks
On 05/12/2015 02:19 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 01:57:36PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 05/12/2015 12:38 PM, Michael Welling wrote:
GPIO chip select patch series appears to have broken the native chip select
support. This patch pulls the manual native chip select toggling
On 05/12/2015 12:38 PM, Michael Welling wrote:
GPIO chip select patch series appears to have broken the native chip select
support. This patch pulls the manual native chip select toggling out of
the transfer_one routine and adds a set_cs routine.
Tested natively on AM3354 with SPI serial
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 01:57:36PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 05/12/2015 12:38 PM, Michael Welling wrote:
GPIO chip select patch series appears to have broken the native chip select
support. This patch pulls the manual native chip select toggling out of
the transfer_one routine and
24 matches
Mail list logo
