Re: [PATCH] spi: spidev_test: Added functionalities

2015-03-07 Thread AdrianRemonda
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 11:54:39PM +, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 07:28:41PM +0100, AdrianRemonda wrote: > > > I apologize for the wrong patch format. > > Should I contact the mantainer of the tool path and ask him where to add > > it? Or how should I proceed? > > I am the

Re: [PATCH] spi: spidev_test: Added functionalities

2015-03-07 Thread AdrianRemonda
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 11:54:39PM +, Mark Brown wrote: On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 07:28:41PM +0100, AdrianRemonda wrote: I apologize for the wrong patch format. Should I contact the mantainer of the tool path and ask him where to add it? Or how should I proceed? I am the relevant

Re: [PATCH] spi: spidev_test: Added functionalities

2015-03-04 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 07:28:41PM +0100, AdrianRemonda wrote: > I apologize for the wrong patch format. > Should I contact the mantainer of the tool path and ask him where to add > it? Or how should I proceed? I am the relevant maintainer here. The main thing from my point of view is to split

Re: [PATCH] spi: spidev_test: Added functionalities

2015-03-04 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 07:28:41PM +0100, AdrianRemonda wrote: I apologize for the wrong patch format. Should I contact the mantainer of the tool path and ask him where to add it? Or how should I proceed? I am the relevant maintainer here. The main thing from my point of view is to split the

Re: [PATCH] spi: spidev_test: Added functionalities

2015-03-01 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 16:27:42 +0900 Mark Brown wrote: > > (Meanwhile, I've applied this one). > > Sorry, I shoud've been clearer that my previous mail was intended as a > nack for the patch as submitted - I'd expected SPI documentation/test > code updates to be going via the SPI tree. I begin

Re: [PATCH] spi: spidev_test: Added functionalities

2015-03-01 Thread AdrianRemonda
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 03:11:17PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 20:08:44 +0100 > Adrian Remonda wrote: > > > This is a patch that add functionalities to the spidev_test tool found > > in Documentation/spi/spidev_test.c. > > This seems good. But our hope is to move useful

Re: [PATCH] spi: spidev_test: Added functionalities

2015-03-01 Thread AdrianRemonda
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 03:11:17PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 20:08:44 +0100 Adrian Remonda adrianremo...@gmail.com wrote: This is a patch that add functionalities to the spidev_test tool found in Documentation/spi/spidev_test.c. This seems good. But our hope is

Re: [PATCH] spi: spidev_test: Added functionalities

2015-03-01 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 16:27:42 +0900 Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote: (Meanwhile, I've applied this one). Sorry, I shoud've been clearer that my previous mail was intended as a nack for the patch as submitted - I'd expected SPI documentation/test code updates to be going via the SPI

Re: [PATCH] spi: spidev_test: Added functionalities

2015-02-27 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 03:11:17PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > (Meanwhile, I've applied this one). Sorry, I shoud've been clearer that my previous mail was intended as a nack for the patch as submitted - I'd expected SPI documentation/test code updates to be going via the SPI tree.

Re: [PATCH] spi: spidev_test: Added functionalities

2015-02-27 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 20:08:44 +0100 Adrian Remonda wrote: > This is a patch that add functionalities to the spidev_test tool found > in Documentation/spi/spidev_test.c. This seems good. But our hope is to move useful code out of Documentation; care to submit a patch putting it properly

Re: [PATCH] spi: spidev_test: Added functionalities

2015-02-27 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 03:11:17PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: (Meanwhile, I've applied this one). Sorry, I shoud've been clearer that my previous mail was intended as a nack for the patch as submitted - I'd expected SPI documentation/test code updates to be going via the SPI tree.

Re: [PATCH] spi: spidev_test: Added functionalities

2015-02-27 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 20:08:44 +0100 Adrian Remonda adrianremo...@gmail.com wrote: This is a patch that add functionalities to the spidev_test tool found in Documentation/spi/spidev_test.c. This seems good. But our hope is to move useful code out of Documentation; care to submit a patch putting

Re: [PATCH] spi: spidev_test: Added functionalities

2015-02-25 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 08:08:44PM +0100, Adrian Remonda wrote: > This is a patch that add functionalities to the spidev_test tool found > in Documentation/spi/spidev_test.c. > - Cleaned hexadecimal dump > - Added verbose mode to see the transmitting sequence > - Added input buffer from the

[PATCH] spi: spidev_test: Added functionalities

2015-02-25 Thread Adrian Remonda
This is a patch that add functionalities to the spidev_test tool found in Documentation/spi/spidev_test.c. - Cleaned hexadecimal dump - Added verbose mode to see the transmitting sequence - Added input buffer from the terminal. Now it is possible to send string and hexadecimal data as an input

[PATCH] spi: spidev_test: Added functionalities

2015-02-25 Thread Adrian Remonda
This is a patch that add functionalities to the spidev_test tool found in Documentation/spi/spidev_test.c. - Cleaned hexadecimal dump - Added verbose mode to see the transmitting sequence - Added input buffer from the terminal. Now it is possible to send string and hexadecimal data as an input

Re: [PATCH] spi: spidev_test: Added functionalities

2015-02-25 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 08:08:44PM +0100, Adrian Remonda wrote: This is a patch that add functionalities to the spidev_test tool found in Documentation/spi/spidev_test.c. - Cleaned hexadecimal dump - Added verbose mode to see the transmitting sequence - Added input buffer from the terminal.