Re: [PATCH] spi: tegra: sequence compatible strings as per preference

2013-01-07 Thread Thierry Reding
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 05:00:09PM +, Grant Likely wrote: > On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:07:42 +0100, Thierry Reding > wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 10:28:38AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > > > On 11/09/2012 10:10 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 10:04:56AM -0700,

Re: [PATCH] spi: tegra: sequence compatible strings as per preference

2013-01-07 Thread Thierry Reding
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 05:00:09PM +, Grant Likely wrote: On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:07:42 +0100, Thierry Reding thierry.red...@avionic-design.de wrote: On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 10:28:38AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: On 11/09/2012 10:10 AM, Mark Brown wrote: On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at

Re: [PATCH] spi: tegra: sequence compatible strings as per preference

2012-12-19 Thread Grant Likely
On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:07:42 +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 10:28:38AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > > On 11/09/2012 10:10 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 10:04:56AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > > > > > >> However just FYI, it should not be

Re: [PATCH] spi: tegra: sequence compatible strings as per preference

2012-12-19 Thread Grant Likely
On Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:07:42 +0100, Thierry Reding thierry.red...@avionic-design.de wrote: On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 10:28:38AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: On 11/09/2012 10:10 AM, Mark Brown wrote: On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 10:04:56AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: However just FYI, it

Re: [PATCH] spi: tegra: sequence compatible strings as per preference

2012-11-10 Thread Thierry Reding
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 10:28:38AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 11/09/2012 10:10 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 10:04:56AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > > > >> However just FYI, it should not be necessary for correctness; The > >> DT matching order is supposed to be

Re: [PATCH] spi: tegra: sequence compatible strings as per preference

2012-11-10 Thread Thierry Reding
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 10:28:38AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: On 11/09/2012 10:10 AM, Mark Brown wrote: On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 10:04:56AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: However just FYI, it should not be necessary for correctness; The DT matching order is supposed to be driven purely by

Re: [PATCH] spi: tegra: sequence compatible strings as per preference

2012-11-09 Thread Stephen Warren
On 11/09/2012 10:10 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 10:04:56AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > >> However just FYI, it should not be necessary for correctness; The >> DT matching order is supposed to be driven purely by the order of >> the compatible values in the DT now, and not

Re: [PATCH] spi: tegra: sequence compatible strings as per preference

2012-11-09 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 10:04:56AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > However just FYI, it should not be necessary for correctness; The DT > matching order is supposed to be driven purely by the order of the > compatible values in the DT now, and not affected by the order of values > in the table.

Re: [PATCH] spi: tegra: sequence compatible strings as per preference

2012-11-09 Thread Stephen Warren
On 11/09/2012 02:07 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > Sequence compatible list for tegra20-slink driver to first > look for Tegra30 and then Tegra20. Tegra30 have additional > feature in HW which need to be utilize if it is provided from DT. I don't object to this patch. However just FYI, it should

Re: [PATCH] spi: tegra: sequence compatible strings as per preference

2012-11-09 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 02:37:32PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > Sequence compatible list for tegra20-slink driver to first > look for Tegra30 and then Tegra20. Tegra30 have additional > feature in HW which need to be utilize if it is provided from DT. Applied, thanks. signature.asc

[PATCH] spi: tegra: sequence compatible strings as per preference

2012-11-09 Thread Laxman Dewangan
Sequence compatible list for tegra20-slink driver to first look for Tegra30 and then Tegra20. Tegra30 have additional feature in HW which need to be utilize if it is provided from DT. Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan --- drivers/spi/spi-tegra20-slink.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+),

[PATCH] spi: tegra: sequence compatible strings as per preference

2012-11-09 Thread Laxman Dewangan
Sequence compatible list for tegra20-slink driver to first look for Tegra30 and then Tegra20. Tegra30 have additional feature in HW which need to be utilize if it is provided from DT. Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan ldewan...@nvidia.com --- drivers/spi/spi-tegra20-slink.c |2 +- 1 files

Re: [PATCH] spi: tegra: sequence compatible strings as per preference

2012-11-09 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 02:37:32PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote: Sequence compatible list for tegra20-slink driver to first look for Tegra30 and then Tegra20. Tegra30 have additional feature in HW which need to be utilize if it is provided from DT. Applied, thanks. signature.asc Description:

Re: [PATCH] spi: tegra: sequence compatible strings as per preference

2012-11-09 Thread Stephen Warren
On 11/09/2012 02:07 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: Sequence compatible list for tegra20-slink driver to first look for Tegra30 and then Tegra20. Tegra30 have additional feature in HW which need to be utilize if it is provided from DT. I don't object to this patch. However just FYI, it should not

Re: [PATCH] spi: tegra: sequence compatible strings as per preference

2012-11-09 Thread Mark Brown
On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 10:04:56AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: However just FYI, it should not be necessary for correctness; The DT matching order is supposed to be driven purely by the order of the compatible values in the DT now, and not affected by the order of values in the table. (This

Re: [PATCH] spi: tegra: sequence compatible strings as per preference

2012-11-09 Thread Stephen Warren
On 11/09/2012 10:10 AM, Mark Brown wrote: On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 10:04:56AM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: However just FYI, it should not be necessary for correctness; The DT matching order is supposed to be driven purely by the order of the compatible values in the DT now, and not affected