RE: [PATCH] staging: lustre: fix return type of lo_release.

2013-05-16 Thread Peng, Tao
nel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: fix return type of lo_release. > > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 06:06:20PM +0200, Cyril Roelandt wrote: > > The return type of block_device_operations.release() changed to void in > > commit > > db2a144b. > > Interesting, ho

RE: [PATCH] staging: lustre: fix return type of lo_release.

2013-05-16 Thread Peng, Tao
el.org > Cc: Cyril Roelandt > Subject: [PATCH] staging: lustre: fix return type of lo_release. > > The return type of block_device_operations.release() changed to void in commit > db2a144b. > > Found with the following Coccinelle patch: > > @has_release_func@ > identi

Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: fix return type of lo_release.

2013-05-16 Thread Cyril Roelandt
On 05/16/2013 09:01 PM, Greg KH wrote: On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 06:06:20PM +0200, Cyril Roelandt wrote: The return type of block_device_operations.release() changed to void in commit db2a144b. Interesting, how did you test build this patch, given that the driver doesn't currently build at all?

Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: fix return type of lo_release.

2013-05-16 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 06:06:20PM +0200, Cyril Roelandt wrote: > The return type of block_device_operations.release() changed to void in commit > db2a144b. Interesting, how did you test build this patch, given that the driver doesn't currently build at all? :) Anyway, thanks, I'll go queue

[PATCH] staging: lustre: fix return type of lo_release.

2013-05-16 Thread Cyril Roelandt
The return type of block_device_operations.release() changed to void in commit db2a144b. Found with the following Coccinelle patch: @has_release_func@ identifier i; identifier release_func; @@ struct block_device_operations i = { .release = release_func }; @depends on has_release_func@

[PATCH] staging: lustre: fix return type of lo_release.

2013-05-16 Thread Cyril Roelandt
The return type of block_device_operations.release() changed to void in commit db2a144b. Found with the following Coccinelle patch: smpl @has_release_func@ identifier i; identifier release_func; @@ struct block_device_operations i = { .release = release_func }; @depends on has_release_func@

Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: fix return type of lo_release.

2013-05-16 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 06:06:20PM +0200, Cyril Roelandt wrote: The return type of block_device_operations.release() changed to void in commit db2a144b. Interesting, how did you test build this patch, given that the driver doesn't currently build at all? :) Anyway, thanks, I'll go queue this

Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: fix return type of lo_release.

2013-05-16 Thread Cyril Roelandt
On 05/16/2013 09:01 PM, Greg KH wrote: On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 06:06:20PM +0200, Cyril Roelandt wrote: The return type of block_device_operations.release() changed to void in commit db2a144b. Interesting, how did you test build this patch, given that the driver doesn't currently build at all?

RE: [PATCH] staging: lustre: fix return type of lo_release.

2013-05-16 Thread Peng, Tao
Roelandt Subject: [PATCH] staging: lustre: fix return type of lo_release. The return type of block_device_operations.release() changed to void in commit db2a144b. Found with the following Coccinelle patch: smpl @has_release_func@ identifier i; identifier release_func; @@ struct

RE: [PATCH] staging: lustre: fix return type of lo_release.

2013-05-16 Thread Peng, Tao
] staging: lustre: fix return type of lo_release. On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 06:06:20PM +0200, Cyril Roelandt wrote: The return type of block_device_operations.release() changed to void in commit db2a144b. Interesting, how did you test build this patch, given that the driver doesn't currently