Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: lustre: llite: Added const

2015-10-04 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 09:13:36PM +0530, Anjali Menon wrote: > Added const to the struct statement which fixed the coding > style warning detected by chekpatch.pl > > WARNING: struct seq_operations should normally be const > > Signed-off-by: Anjali Menon > --- Again same problem. This has

Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: lustre: llite: Added const

2015-10-04 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 09:13:36PM +0530, Anjali Menon wrote: > Added const to the struct statement which fixed the coding > style warning detected by chekpatch.pl > > WARNING: struct seq_operations should normally be const > > Signed-off-by: Anjali Menon > --- Again

[PATCH] staging: lustre: lustre: llite: Added const

2015-10-03 Thread Anjali Menon
Added const to the struct statement which fixed the coding style warning detected by chekpatch.pl WARNING: struct seq_operations should normally be const Signed-off-by: Anjali Menon --- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/vvp_dev.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff

[PATCH] staging: lustre: lustre: llite: Added const

2015-10-03 Thread Anjali Menon
Added const to the struct statement which fixed the coding style warning detected by chekpatch.pl WARNING: struct seq_operations should normally be const Signed-off-by: Anjali Menon --- drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/vvp_dev.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1