From: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_...@trendmicro.com.cn> Using list_move() instead of list_del() + list_add().
spatch with a semantic match is used to found this problem. (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yongjun_...@trendmicro.com.cn> --- drivers/staging/wlags49_h2/wl_netdev.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlags49_h2/wl_netdev.c b/drivers/staging/wlags49_h2/wl_netdev.c index 824b852..e401b49 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/wlags49_h2/wl_netdev.c +++ b/drivers/staging/wlags49_h2/wl_netdev.c @@ -836,8 +836,7 @@ int wl_tx( struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, int port ) txF->frame.port = port; /* Move the frame to the txQ */ /* NOTE: Here's where we would do priority queueing */ - list_del( &( txF->node )); - list_add( &( txF->node ), &( lp->txQ[0] )); + list_move(&(txF->node), &(lp->txQ[0])); lp->txQ_count++; if( lp->txQ_count >= DEFAULT_NUM_TX_FRAMES ) { -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/