Re: [PATCH] time locale in gen_initramfs_list.sh

2007-05-09 Thread Rob Landley
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 8:09 pm, Andrew Morton wrote: > hm, --time-style sounds rather gnu-specific and perhaps we'd rather not > add that requirement. Or perhaps we already require gnu ls, dunno. Running this sort of thing with busybox instead of the gnu tools is why I sent the gawk/awk

Re: [PATCH] time locale in gen_initramfs_list.sh

2007-05-09 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 8 May 2007 07:55:26 +0200 Florian Fainelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I noticed that some zsh users who forced their ls formatting to something non > standard could not generate the initramfs file list. Forcing the locale to C > while generating seems not to be enough. Adding

Re: [PATCH] time locale in gen_initramfs_list.sh

2007-05-09 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 8 May 2007 07:55:26 +0200 Florian Fainelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I noticed that some zsh users who forced their ls formatting to something non standard could not generate the initramfs file list. Forcing the locale to C while generating seems not to be enough. Adding

Re: [PATCH] time locale in gen_initramfs_list.sh

2007-05-09 Thread Rob Landley
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 8:09 pm, Andrew Morton wrote: hm, --time-style sounds rather gnu-specific and perhaps we'd rather not add that requirement. Or perhaps we already require gnu ls, dunno. Running this sort of thing with busybox instead of the gnu tools is why I sent the gawk/awk patches

Re: [PATCH] time locale in gen_initramfs_list.sh

2007-05-08 Thread Michael Mauch
Florian Fainelli wrote: > This is true. According to GNU fileutils changelog, the nearest Changelog > message regarding this option is : > > 2004-11-19 Alfred M. Szmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >* src/ls.c (usage): Clarified description of --no-group (-G), >--human-readable

Re: [PATCH] time locale in gen_initramfs_list.sh

2007-05-08 Thread Florian Fainelli
Hello Peter, This is true. According to GNU fileutils changelog, the nearest Changelog message regarding this option is : 2004-11-19 Alfred M. Szmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * src/ls.c (usage): Clarified description of --no-group (-G), --human-readable (-h), --inode (-i), --size

Re: [PATCH] time locale in gen_initramfs_list.sh

2007-05-08 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Florian Fainelli wrote: > I noticed that some zsh users who forced their ls formatting to something non > standard could not generate the initramfs file list. Forcing the locale to C > while generating seems not to be enough. Adding --time-style=locale will use > C locale ls output and will let

[PATCH] time locale in gen_initramfs_list.sh

2007-05-08 Thread Florian Fainelli
I noticed that some zsh users who forced their ls formatting to something non standard could not generate the initramfs file list. Forcing the locale to C while generating seems not to be enough. Adding --time-style=locale will use C locale ls output and will let them generate the initramfs

[PATCH] time locale in gen_initramfs_list.sh

2007-05-08 Thread Florian Fainelli
I noticed that some zsh users who forced their ls formatting to something non standard could not generate the initramfs file list. Forcing the locale to C while generating seems not to be enough. Adding --time-style=locale will use C locale ls output and will let them generate the initramfs

Re: [PATCH] time locale in gen_initramfs_list.sh

2007-05-08 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Florian Fainelli wrote: I noticed that some zsh users who forced their ls formatting to something non standard could not generate the initramfs file list. Forcing the locale to C while generating seems not to be enough. Adding --time-style=locale will use C locale ls output and will let

Re: [PATCH] time locale in gen_initramfs_list.sh

2007-05-08 Thread Florian Fainelli
Hello Peter, This is true. According to GNU fileutils changelog, the nearest Changelog message regarding this option is : 2004-11-19 Alfred M. Szmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] * src/ls.c (usage): Clarified description of --no-group (-G), --human-readable (-h), --inode (-i), --size

Re: [PATCH] time locale in gen_initramfs_list.sh

2007-05-08 Thread Michael Mauch
Florian Fainelli wrote: This is true. According to GNU fileutils changelog, the nearest Changelog message regarding this option is : 2004-11-19 Alfred M. Szmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] * src/ls.c (usage): Clarified description of --no-group (-G), --human-readable (-h), --inode