On 27/03/15 12:57, Daniel Baluta wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Irina Tirdea wrote:
>> When using generic_buffer to read data, the scale is not properly
>> detected for scale shared by type. This is caused by a problem
>> with the generation of generic name out of the full name.
>>
On 27/03/15 12:57, Daniel Baluta wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Irina Tirdea irina.tir...@intel.com wrote:
When using generic_buffer to read data, the scale is not properly
detected for scale shared by type. This is caused by a problem
with the generation of generic name out of the
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Irina Tirdea wrote:
> When using generic_buffer to read data, the scale is not properly
> detected for scale shared by type. This is caused by a problem
> with the generation of generic name out of the full name.
> E.g.: for current->name in_accel_z, the extracted
When using generic_buffer to read data, the scale is not properly
detected for scale shared by type. This is caused by a problem
with the generation of generic name out of the full name.
E.g.: for current->name in_accel_z, the extracted generic name
is "in" (when it should be "in_accel"). This is
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Irina Tirdea irina.tir...@intel.com wrote:
When using generic_buffer to read data, the scale is not properly
detected for scale shared by type. This is caused by a problem
with the generation of generic name out of the full name.
E.g.: for current-name
When using generic_buffer to read data, the scale is not properly
detected for scale shared by type. This is caused by a problem
with the generation of generic name out of the full name.
E.g.: for current-name in_accel_z, the extracted generic name
is in (when it should be in_accel). This is used
6 matches
Mail list logo