On Mon 07-01-08 21:44:26, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 12:26:18PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 01:44:34AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > +static struct udf_bitmap *udf_sb_alloc_bitmap(struct super_block *sb,
> > > __u32 index)
> > > +{
> > >
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 03:28:15PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 21:44:26 +0100
> Marcin Slusarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > There's some overly long lines here and some odd style, this should look
> > > more like:
> > These long lines were split later in "[PATCH 1/7] udf
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 21:44:26 +0100
Marcin Slusarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There's some overly long lines here and some odd style, this should look
> > more like:
> These long lines were split later in "[PATCH 1/7] udf: fix coding style"
Confused. How can patch 1/n come "later" than this on
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 12:26:18PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 01:44:34AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > +static struct udf_bitmap *udf_sb_alloc_bitmap(struct super_block *sb,
> > __u32 index)
> > +{
> > + struct udf_part_map *map = &UDF_SB(sb)->s_partmaps[inde
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 01:44:34AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> +static struct udf_bitmap *udf_sb_alloc_bitmap(struct super_block *sb, __u32
> index)
> +{
> + struct udf_part_map *map = &UDF_SB(sb)->s_partmaps[index];
> + int nr_groups = (map->s_partition_len + (sizeof(struct spaceBit
convert UDF_SB_ALLOC_BITMAP macro to udf_sb_alloc_bitmap function
convert UDF_SB_FREE_BITMAP macro to udf_sb_free_bitmap function
Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Ben Fennema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Jan Kara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs
6 matches
Mail list logo