Re: [PATCH] use mutex instead of binary semaphore in CDU-31A driver

2007-04-24 Thread Corey Minyard
This is fine with me; I don't see any problems in it and the mutex is better. However, I cannot test this as I have no hardware left capable of hosting the drive. -corey Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: use mutex instead of binary semaphore in CDU-31A driver Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <[EMAIL

Re: [PATCH] use mutex instead of binary semaphore in CDU-31A driver

2007-04-24 Thread Corey Minyard
This is fine with me; I don't see any problems in it and the mutex is better. However, I cannot test this as I have no hardware left capable of hosting the drive. -corey Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: use mutex instead of binary semaphore in CDU-31A driver Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke [EMAIL

[PATCH] use mutex instead of binary semaphore in CDU-31A driver

2007-04-23 Thread Matthias Kaehlcke
use mutex instead of binary semaphore in CDU-31A driver Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- diff --git a/drivers/cdrom/cdu31a.c b/drivers/cdrom/cdu31a.c index 2157c58..d3649e4 100644 --- a/drivers/cdrom/cdu31a.c +++ b/drivers/cdrom/cdu31a.c @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ static int

[PATCH] use mutex instead of binary semaphore in CDU-31A driver

2007-04-23 Thread Matthias Kaehlcke
use mutex instead of binary semaphore in CDU-31A driver Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- diff --git a/drivers/cdrom/cdu31a.c b/drivers/cdrom/cdu31a.c index 2157c58..d3649e4 100644 --- a/drivers/cdrom/cdu31a.c +++ b/drivers/cdrom/cdu31a.c @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ static int