Quoting Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:00:39 -0500 "Serge E. Hallyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > When CONFIG_UTS_NS=n, clone(CLONE_NEWUTS) quietly refuses. So correctly
> > does
> > not unshare a new uts namespace, but also does not return -EINVAL.
> >
> >
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:00:39 -0500 "Serge E. Hallyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When CONFIG_UTS_NS=n, clone(CLONE_NEWUTS) quietly refuses. So correctly does
> not unshare a new uts namespace, but also does not return -EINVAL.
>
> Fix this to return -EINVAL so the caller knows his request was
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:00:39 -0500 Serge E. Hallyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When CONFIG_UTS_NS=n, clone(CLONE_NEWUTS) quietly refuses. So correctly does
not unshare a new uts namespace, but also does not return -EINVAL.
Fix this to return -EINVAL so the caller knows his request was denied.
Quoting Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 15:00:39 -0500 Serge E. Hallyn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
When CONFIG_UTS_NS=n, clone(CLONE_NEWUTS) quietly refuses. So correctly
does
not unshare a new uts namespace, but also does not return -EINVAL.
Fix this to
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [PATCH] utsns: fix !CONFIG_UTS_NS behavior
When CONFIG_UTS_NS=n, clone(CLONE_NEWUTS) quietly refuses. So correctly does
not unshare a new uts namespace, but also does not return -EINVAL.
Fix this to return -EINVAL so the
From: Serge E. Hallyn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PATCH] utsns: fix !CONFIG_UTS_NS behavior
When CONFIG_UTS_NS=n, clone(CLONE_NEWUTS) quietly refuses. So correctly does
not unshare a new uts namespace, but also does not return -EINVAL.
Fix this to return -EINVAL so the caller knows his request
6 matches
Mail list logo
