On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:25:00 -0700
Ulrich Drepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > there's a little bit of intersection with lutimesat() there.
>
> I totally forgot about this. Please do not merge the current lutimesat
> patch. We have to change it to lutimensat() the same
Andrew Morton wrote:
> there's a little bit of intersection with lutimesat() there.
I totally forgot about this. Please do not merge the current lutimesat
patch. We have to change it to lutimensat() the same way this new
utimensat() improves over futimesat().
Do yo have the broken out patch
urgh.
patching file arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S
Hunk #1 FAILED at 714.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S.rej
patching file fs/compat.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 79.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/compat.c.rej
patching file fs/utimes.c
urgh.
patching file arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S
Hunk #1 FAILED at 714.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
arch/x86_64/ia32/ia32entry.S.rej
patching file fs/compat.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 79.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/compat.c.rej
patching file fs/utimes.c
Andrew Morton wrote:
there's a little bit of intersection with lutimesat() there.
I totally forgot about this. Please do not merge the current lutimesat
patch. We have to change it to lutimensat() the same way this new
utimensat() improves over futimesat().
Do yo have the broken out patch
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:25:00 -0700
Ulrich Drepper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
there's a little bit of intersection with lutimesat() there.
I totally forgot about this. Please do not merge the current lutimesat
patch. We have to change it to lutimensat() the same way
One comment I got suggested to clean up the overflow tests. There
is no reason to not perform the full micro-second overflow test
in those two places. The four conditions are reduced by the compiler
to just two tests so there's no problems with performance.
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Drepper <[EMAIL
One comment I got suggested to clean up the overflow tests. There
is no reason to not perform the full micro-second overflow test
in those two places. The four conditions are reduced by the compiler
to just two tests so there's no problems with performance.
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Drepper [EMAIL
8 matches
Mail list logo