Re: [PATCH] ver_linux: libcpp.patch

On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 09:17:42PM +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: >> Neither 'libg++.so', nor 'libstdc++.so' were found where the current >> implementation expects them to be found in the distros below. >> >> >> Gentoo Linux >> Debian 6.0.10 >>

Re: [PATCH] ver_linux: libcpp.patch

On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 09:17:42PM +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: >> Neither 'libg++.so', nor 'libstdc++.so' were found where the current >> implementation expects them to be found in the distros below. >> >> >> Gentoo

Re: [PATCH] ver_linux: libcpp.patch

On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 09:17:42PM +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > Neither 'libg++.so', nor 'libstdc++.so' were found where the current > implementation expects them to be found in the distros below. > > > Gentoo Linux > Debian 6.0.10 > Oracle Linux Server release 7.1 > > The proposed

[PATCH] ver_linux: libcpp.patch

Neither 'libg++.so', nor 'libstdc++.so' were found where the current implementation expects them to be found in the distros below. Gentoo Linux Debian 6.0.10 Oracle Linux Server release 7.1 The proposed implementation relies on 'ldconfig' to locate the libraries in question. 'Sed' is used to

[PATCH] ver_linux: libcpp.patch

Neither 'libg++.so', nor 'libstdc++.so' were found where the current implementation expects them to be found in the distros below. Gentoo Linux Debian 6.0.10 Oracle Linux Server release 7.1 The proposed implementation relies on 'ldconfig' to locate the libraries in question. 'Sed' is used to

Re: [PATCH] ver_linux: libcpp.patch

On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 09:17:42PM +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > Neither 'libg++.so', nor 'libstdc++.so' were found where the current > implementation expects them to be found in the distros below. > > > Gentoo Linux > Debian 6.0.10 > Oracle Linux Server release 7.1 > > The proposed