> From: Stefano Garzarella
> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2019 3:25 AM
> > [...snipped...]
> > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c
> > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c
> > @@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ static void hvs_release(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
> > struct sock *sk = sk_vsock(vsk);
> >
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 03:14:22AM +, Dexuan Cui wrote:
> Lockdep is unhappy if two locks from the same class are held.
>
> Fix the below warning by making __vsock_release() non-recursive -- this
> patch is kind of ugly, but it looks to me there is not a better way to
> deal with the problem
From: Dexuan Cui
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 03:14:22 +
> +static void __vsock_release2(struct sock *sk)
Do not duplicate an entire function just to adjust some aspect of the
lock debugging, please find a cleaner and more minimal way to
implement this fix.
Lockdep is unhappy if two locks from the same class are held.
Fix the below warning by making __vsock_release() non-recursive -- this
patch is kind of ugly, but it looks to me there is not a better way to
deal with the problem here.
WARNING: possible
4 matches
Mail list logo
