Hi Guenter,
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 08:55:41AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/16/2016 08:50 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 10/16/2016 08:33 AM, Sylvain Rochet wrote:
> > >
> > > Looks like this one falls through the cracks, it didn't reach mainline
> > > and therefore wasn't applied to stab
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 01:01:12PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 06/10/2015 at 22:28:45 +0200, Sylvain Rochet wrote :
> > Since turning on idle-halt in commit 5161b31dc39a (watchdog:
> > at91sam9_wdt: better watchdog support"), SoCs compatible with
> > at91sam9260-wdt not using a device
On 10/16/2016 08:50 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 10/16/2016 08:33 AM, Sylvain Rochet wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 01:01:12PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
On 06/10/2015 at 22:28:45 +0200, Sylvain Rochet wrote :
Since turning on idle-halt in commit 5161b31dc39a (watchdog:
at91sam9_wdt:
On 10/16/2016 08:33 AM, Sylvain Rochet wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 01:01:12PM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
On 06/10/2015 at 22:28:45 +0200, Sylvain Rochet wrote :
Since turning on idle-halt in commit 5161b31dc39a (watchdog:
at91sam9_wdt: better watchdog support"), SoCs compatible wit
Hi Sylvain,
On 06/10/2015 at 22:28:45 +0200, Sylvain Rochet wrote :
> Since turning on idle-halt in commit 5161b31dc39a (watchdog:
> at91sam9_wdt: better watchdog support"), SoCs compatible with
> at91sam9260-wdt not using a device tree no longer reboot if the watchdog
> times out while the CPU is
Since turning on idle-halt in commit 5161b31dc39a (watchdog:
at91sam9_wdt: better watchdog support"), SoCs compatible with
at91sam9260-wdt not using a device tree no longer reboot if the watchdog
times out while the CPU is in idle state. Removing the
AT91_WDT_WDIDLEHLT flag that was set by default
6 matches
Mail list logo