Re: [PATCH] wimax/i2400m: Remove VLAIS

2017-10-25 Thread Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
> On Oct 25, 2017, at 10:39, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-10-25 at 17:12 +, Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky wrote: >>> On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 21:00 +, Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky wrote: > ping any comments on this? None from me; I don't have access to this HW

Re: [PATCH] wimax/i2400m: Remove VLAIS

2017-10-25 Thread Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
> On Oct 25, 2017, at 10:39, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Wed, 2017-10-25 at 17:12 +, Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky wrote: >>> On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 21:00 +, Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky wrote: > ping any comments on this? None from me; I don't have access to this HW anymore, so I can't

Re: [PATCH] wimax/i2400m: Remove VLAIS

2017-10-25 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 9:46 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > El Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 12:41:53PM -0700 Matthias Kaehlcke ha dit: >> + u8 cmd_payload[]; >> } __packed *buf; >> struct i2400m_bootrom_header ack; > > ping > > any comments on this? What for?

Re: [PATCH] wimax/i2400m: Remove VLAIS

2017-10-25 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 9:46 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > El Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 12:41:53PM -0700 Matthias Kaehlcke ha dit: >> + u8 cmd_payload[]; >> } __packed *buf; >> struct i2400m_bootrom_header ack; > > ping > > any comments on this? What for? The patch is

Re: [PATCH] wimax/i2400m: Remove VLAIS

2017-10-25 Thread Dan Williams
On Wed, 2017-10-25 at 17:12 +, Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 21:00 +, Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky wrote: > > > > ping any comments on this? > > > > > > None from me; I don't have access to this HW anymore, so I can't > > > validate if the change would work or not. > > I

Re: [PATCH] wimax/i2400m: Remove VLAIS

2017-10-25 Thread Dan Williams
On Wed, 2017-10-25 at 17:12 +, Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 21:00 +, Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky wrote: > > > > ping any comments on this? > > > > > > None from me; I don't have access to this HW anymore, so I can't > > > validate if the change would work or not. > > I

RE: [PATCH] wimax/i2400m: Remove VLAIS

2017-10-25 Thread Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
>On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 21:00 +, Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky wrote: >> > ping any comments on this? >> >> None from me; I don't have access to this HW anymore, so I can't >> validate if the change would work or not. > I still have a 5350 around somewhere, I can make sure firmware loads if > you

RE: [PATCH] wimax/i2400m: Remove VLAIS

2017-10-25 Thread Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
>On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 21:00 +, Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky wrote: >> > ping any comments on this? >> >> None from me; I don't have access to this HW anymore, so I can't >> validate if the change would work or not. > I still have a 5350 around somewhere, I can make sure firmware loads if > you

Re: [PATCH] wimax/i2400m: Remove VLAIS

2017-10-25 Thread Dan Williams
On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 21:00 +, Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky wrote: > > ping > > any comments on this? > > None from me; I don't have access to this HW anymore, so I can't > validate > if the change would work or not. I still have a 5350 around somewhere, I can make sure firmware loads if you like.

Re: [PATCH] wimax/i2400m: Remove VLAIS

2017-10-25 Thread Dan Williams
On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 21:00 +, Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky wrote: > > ping > > any comments on this? > > None from me; I don't have access to this HW anymore, so I can't > validate > if the change would work or not. I still have a 5350 around somewhere, I can make sure firmware loads if you like.

RE: [PATCH] wimax/i2400m: Remove VLAIS

2017-10-24 Thread Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
> ping > any comments on this? None from me; I don't have access to this HW anymore, so I can't validate if the change would work or not.

RE: [PATCH] wimax/i2400m: Remove VLAIS

2017-10-24 Thread Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
> ping > any comments on this? None from me; I don't have access to this HW anymore, so I can't validate if the change would work or not.

Re: [PATCH] wimax/i2400m: Remove VLAIS

2017-10-24 Thread Matthias Kaehlcke
El Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 12:41:53PM -0700 Matthias Kaehlcke ha dit: > From: Behan Webster > > Convert Variable Length Array in Struct (VLAIS) to valid C by converting > local struct definition to use a flexible array. The structure is only > used to define a cast of a

Re: [PATCH] wimax/i2400m: Remove VLAIS

2017-10-24 Thread Matthias Kaehlcke
El Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 12:41:53PM -0700 Matthias Kaehlcke ha dit: > From: Behan Webster > > Convert Variable Length Array in Struct (VLAIS) to valid C by converting > local struct definition to use a flexible array. The structure is only > used to define a cast of a buffer so the size of the

[PATCH] wimax/i2400m: Remove VLAIS

2017-10-09 Thread Matthias Kaehlcke
From: Behan Webster Convert Variable Length Array in Struct (VLAIS) to valid C by converting local struct definition to use a flexible array. The structure is only used to define a cast of a buffer so the size of the struct is not used to allocate storage.

[PATCH] wimax/i2400m: Remove VLAIS

2017-10-09 Thread Matthias Kaehlcke
From: Behan Webster Convert Variable Length Array in Struct (VLAIS) to valid C by converting local struct definition to use a flexible array. The structure is only used to define a cast of a buffer so the size of the struct is not used to allocate storage. Signed-off-by: Behan Webster