On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 06:55:14PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, February 16, 2015 08:36:37 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Mon 2015-02-16 10:11:13, Jiang Liu wrote:
> > > Commit b568b8601f05 ("Treat SCI interrupt as normal GSI interrupt")
> > > accidently removes support of legacy PIC
On Monday, February 16, 2015 08:36:37 PM Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2015-02-16 10:11:13, Jiang Liu wrote:
> > Commit b568b8601f05 ("Treat SCI interrupt as normal GSI interrupt")
> > accidently removes support of legacy PIC interrupt when fixing a
>
> accidentaly?
>
> > regression for Xen, which
On Mon 2015-02-16 10:11:13, Jiang Liu wrote:
> Commit b568b8601f05 ("Treat SCI interrupt as normal GSI interrupt")
> accidently removes support of legacy PIC interrupt when fixing a
accidentaly?
> regression for Xen, which causes a nasty regression on HP/Compaq
> nc6000 where we fail to register
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:11:13AM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> Commit b568b8601f05 ("Treat SCI interrupt as normal GSI interrupt")
> accidently removes support of legacy PIC interrupt when fixing a
> regression for Xen, which causes a nasty regression on HP/Compaq
> nc6000 where we fail to register t
Commit b568b8601f05 ("Treat SCI interrupt as normal GSI interrupt")
accidently removes support of legacy PIC interrupt when fixing a
regression for Xen, which causes a nasty regression on HP/Compaq
nc6000 where we fail to register the ACPI interrupt, and thus
lose eg. thermal notifications leading
5 matches
Mail list logo