Hi Scotty,
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:39:32AM -0700, Scotty Bauer wrote:
> For what its worth I tried it out and it works fine on my end.
>
> Thanks for doing the hard work for me, Boris. Also, thanks for a pointer to
> the alternatives.
>
> I think it may be worth doing a patch that is almost
things
consistent. I can work on that over the weekend.
--Scotty
On 02/06/2015 09:13 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov
> Subject: [PATCH] x86, smpboot: Call CLFLUSH only on
> X86_BUG_CLFLUSH_MONITOR-affected CPUs
>
> Make the AAI65 erratum workaround for Xeon 740
things
consistent. I can work on that over the weekend.
--Scotty
On 02/06/2015 09:13 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
From: Borislav Petkov b...@suse.de
Subject: [PATCH] x86, smpboot: Call CLFLUSH only on
X86_BUG_CLFLUSH_MONITOR-affected CPUs
Make the AAI65 erratum workaround for Xeon 7400
Hi Scotty,
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:39:32AM -0700, Scotty Bauer wrote:
For what its worth I tried it out and it works fine on my end.
Thanks for doing the hard work for me, Boris. Also, thanks for a pointer to
the alternatives.
I think it may be worth doing a patch that is almost
From: Borislav Petkov
Subject: [PATCH] x86, smpboot: Call CLFLUSH only on
X86_BUG_CLFLUSH_MONITOR-affected CPUs
Make the AAI65 erratum workaround for Xeon 7400 machines only instead of
punishing all CPUs doing idle with MWAIT with the CLFLUSH penalty.
Based on a patch originally by Scotty
From: Borislav Petkov b...@suse.de
Subject: [PATCH] x86, smpboot: Call CLFLUSH only on
X86_BUG_CLFLUSH_MONITOR-affected CPUs
Make the AAI65 erratum workaround for Xeon 7400 machines only instead of
punishing all CPUs doing idle with MWAIT with the CLFLUSH penalty.
Based on a patch originally
6 matches
Mail list logo
