On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 01:46:11PM -0500, Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote:
> Your understanding is correct. I was not sure about what you were referring
> to earlier. Basically, the number of threads sharing cache is used to
> calculate the amount of right-shifting of APIC ID, which results in
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 01:46:11PM -0500, Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote:
> Your understanding is correct. I was not sure about what you were referring
> to earlier. Basically, the number of threads sharing cache is used to
> calculate the amount of right-shifting of APIC ID, which results in
Boris,
On 6/18/2018 1:23 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 01:14:11PM -0500, Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote:
This enumeration is only for the family17h model 00-1Fh of hardware
revision. The patch is intended for the future revision of hardware.
I realized that but the same
Boris,
On 6/18/2018 1:23 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 01:14:11PM -0500, Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote:
This enumeration is only for the family17h model 00-1Fh of hardware
revision. The patch is intended for the future revision of hardware.
I realized that but the same
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 01:14:11PM -0500, Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote:
> This enumeration is only for the family17h model 00-1Fh of hardware
> revision. The patch is intended for the future revision of hardware.
I realized that but the same holds true for the future revision - there
you need to
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 01:14:11PM -0500, Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote:
> This enumeration is only for the family17h model 00-1Fh of hardware
> revision. The patch is intended for the future revision of hardware.
I realized that but the same holds true for the future revision - there
you need to
Boris,
On 6/18/2018 12:20 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 01:43:10PM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
The current logic incorrectly calculates the LLC ID from the APIC ID.
Unless specified otherwise, the LLC ID should be calculated from
the count order of the number of
Boris,
On 6/18/2018 12:20 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 01:43:10PM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
The current logic incorrectly calculates the LLC ID from the APIC ID.
Unless specified otherwise, the LLC ID should be calculated from
the count order of the number of
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 01:43:10PM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> The current logic incorrectly calculates the LLC ID from the APIC ID.
> Unless specified otherwise, the LLC ID should be calculated from
> the count order of the number of threads sharing cache.
Don't you mean:
"... should
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 01:43:10PM -0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> The current logic incorrectly calculates the LLC ID from the APIC ID.
> Unless specified otherwise, the LLC ID should be calculated from
> the count order of the number of threads sharing cache.
Don't you mean:
"... should
The current logic incorrectly calculates the LLC ID from the APIC ID.
Unless specified otherwise, the LLC ID should be calculated from
the count order of the number of threads sharing cache.
Fixes: 68091ee7ac3c ("Calculate last level cache ID from number of sharing
threads")
Signed-off-by:
The current logic incorrectly calculates the LLC ID from the APIC ID.
Unless specified otherwise, the LLC ID should be calculated from
the count order of the number of threads sharing cache.
Fixes: 68091ee7ac3c ("Calculate last level cache ID from number of sharing
threads")
Signed-off-by:
12 matches
Mail list logo
