Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Remove always empty $(USERINCLUDE)

2016-11-03 Thread Matt Fleming
On Thu, 03 Nov, at 10:51:38AM, Paul Bolle wrote: > Apparently Matt left Intel. Let's forward this to a recently used > address. > > On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 10:47 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > > Commmit b6eea87fc685 ("x86, boot: Explicitly include autoconf.h for > > hostprogs") correctly noted > >

Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Remove always empty $(USERINCLUDE)

2016-11-03 Thread Matt Fleming
On Thu, 03 Nov, at 10:51:38AM, Paul Bolle wrote: > Apparently Matt left Intel. Let's forward this to a recently used > address. > > On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 10:47 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > > Commmit b6eea87fc685 ("x86, boot: Explicitly include autoconf.h for > > hostprogs") correctly noted > >

Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Remove always empty $(USERINCLUDE)

2016-11-03 Thread Paul Bolle
Apparently Matt left Intel. Let's forward this to a recently used address. On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 10:47 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > Commmit b6eea87fc685 ("x86, boot: Explicitly include autoconf.h for > hostprogs") correctly noted > [...] that because $(USERINCLUDE) isn't exported by > the

Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Remove always empty $(USERINCLUDE)

2016-11-03 Thread Paul Bolle
Apparently Matt left Intel. Let's forward this to a recently used address. On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 10:47 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > Commmit b6eea87fc685 ("x86, boot: Explicitly include autoconf.h for > hostprogs") correctly noted > [...] that because $(USERINCLUDE) isn't exported by > the

[PATCH] x86/boot: Remove always empty $(USERINCLUDE)

2016-11-03 Thread Paul Bolle
Commmit b6eea87fc685 ("x86, boot: Explicitly include autoconf.h for hostprogs") correctly noted [...] that because $(USERINCLUDE) isn't exported by the top-level Makefile it's actually empty in arch/x86/boot/Makefile. So let's do the sane thing and remove the reference to that make

[PATCH] x86/boot: Remove always empty $(USERINCLUDE)

2016-11-03 Thread Paul Bolle
Commmit b6eea87fc685 ("x86, boot: Explicitly include autoconf.h for hostprogs") correctly noted [...] that because $(USERINCLUDE) isn't exported by the top-level Makefile it's actually empty in arch/x86/boot/Makefile. So let's do the sane thing and remove the reference to that make