On Thu, 03 Nov, at 10:51:38AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Apparently Matt left Intel. Let's forward this to a recently used
> address.
>
> On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 10:47 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > Commmit b6eea87fc685 ("x86, boot: Explicitly include autoconf.h for
> > hostprogs") correctly noted
> >
On Thu, 03 Nov, at 10:51:38AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Apparently Matt left Intel. Let's forward this to a recently used
> address.
>
> On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 10:47 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > Commmit b6eea87fc685 ("x86, boot: Explicitly include autoconf.h for
> > hostprogs") correctly noted
> >
Apparently Matt left Intel. Let's forward this to a recently used
address.
On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 10:47 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Commmit b6eea87fc685 ("x86, boot: Explicitly include autoconf.h for
> hostprogs") correctly noted
> [...] that because $(USERINCLUDE) isn't exported by
> the
Apparently Matt left Intel. Let's forward this to a recently used
address.
On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 10:47 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Commmit b6eea87fc685 ("x86, boot: Explicitly include autoconf.h for
> hostprogs") correctly noted
> [...] that because $(USERINCLUDE) isn't exported by
> the
Commmit b6eea87fc685 ("x86, boot: Explicitly include autoconf.h for
hostprogs") correctly noted
[...] that because $(USERINCLUDE) isn't exported by
the top-level Makefile it's actually empty in arch/x86/boot/Makefile.
So let's do the sane thing and remove the reference to that make
Commmit b6eea87fc685 ("x86, boot: Explicitly include autoconf.h for
hostprogs") correctly noted
[...] that because $(USERINCLUDE) isn't exported by
the top-level Makefile it's actually empty in arch/x86/boot/Makefile.
So let's do the sane thing and remove the reference to that make
6 matches
Mail list logo