On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 04:59:10PM +, Michael Kelley wrote:
From: Wei Liu Sent: Monday, October 5, 2020 7:59 AM
On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 05:40:15PM +, Michael Kelley wrote:
> From: Sasha Levin Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 6:04 AM
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 11:53:59AM +,
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 04:59:10PM +, Michael Kelley wrote:
> From: Wei Liu Sent: Monday, October 5, 2020 7:59 AM
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 05:40:15PM +, Michael Kelley wrote:
> > > From: Sasha Levin Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020
> > > 6:04 AM
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 01,
From: Wei Liu Sent: Monday, October 5, 2020 7:59 AM
>
> On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 05:40:15PM +, Michael Kelley wrote:
> > From: Sasha Levin Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 6:04
> > AM
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 11:53:59AM +, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > >On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at
On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 05:40:15PM +, Michael Kelley wrote:
> From: Sasha Levin Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 6:04 AM
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 11:53:59AM +, Wei Liu wrote:
> > >On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 11:40:04AM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> > >> Sasha Levin writes:
> > >>
From: Sasha Levin Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 6:04 AM
>
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 11:53:59AM +, Wei Liu wrote:
> >On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 11:40:04AM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> >> Sasha Levin writes:
> >>
> >> > cpumask can change underneath us, which is generally safe except when
Wei Liu writes:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 11:40:04AM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> Sasha Levin writes:
>>
>> > cpumask can change underneath us, which is generally safe except when we
>> > call into hv_cpu_number_to_vp_number(): if cpumask ends up empty we pass
>> > num_cpu_possible() into
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 11:53:59AM +, Wei Liu wrote:
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 11:40:04AM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
Sasha Levin writes:
> cpumask can change underneath us, which is generally safe except when we
> call into hv_cpu_number_to_vp_number(): if cpumask ends up empty we pass
On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 11:40:04AM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Sasha Levin writes:
>
> > cpumask can change underneath us, which is generally safe except when we
> > call into hv_cpu_number_to_vp_number(): if cpumask ends up empty we pass
> > num_cpu_possible() into
Sasha Levin writes:
> cpumask can change underneath us, which is generally safe except when we
> call into hv_cpu_number_to_vp_number(): if cpumask ends up empty we pass
> num_cpu_possible() into hv_cpu_number_to_vp_number(), causing it to read
> garbage. As reported by KASAN:
>
> [ 83.504763]
cpumask can change underneath us, which is generally safe except when we
call into hv_cpu_number_to_vp_number(): if cpumask ends up empty we pass
num_cpu_possible() into hv_cpu_number_to_vp_number(), causing it to read
garbage. As reported by KASAN:
[ 83.504763] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds
10 matches
Mail list logo