On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 04:30:26PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> The CS base was initialized to 0 on VMX (wrong, but usually overridden
> by userspace before starting) or 0xf on SVM. The correct value is
> 0x, and VMX is able to emulate it now, so use it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonz
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 05:41:45PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2013-03-19 16:43, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 04:30:26PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> The CS base was initialized to 0 on VMX (wrong, but usually overridden
> >> by userspace before starting) or 0xf on SVM.
On 2013-03-19 16:43, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 04:30:26PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> The CS base was initialized to 0 on VMX (wrong, but usually overridden
>> by userspace before starting) or 0xf on SVM. The correct value is
>> 0x, and VMX is able to emulate it
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 04:30:26PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> The CS base was initialized to 0 on VMX (wrong, but usually overridden
> by userspace before starting) or 0xf on SVM. The correct value is
> 0x, and VMX is able to emulate it now, so use it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonz
The CS base was initialized to 0 on VMX (wrong, but usually overridden
by userspace before starting) or 0xf on SVM. The correct value is
0x, and VMX is able to emulate it now, so use it.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 8 +---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 1 +
2 fi
5 matches
Mail list logo