On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 11:41:29AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 10:34:37AM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 03:37:31PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > >
> > > Note: This patch does not fix the uname -m issue - to do so
> > > Andreas' patch is
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 10:34:37AM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 03:37:31PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >
> > Note: This patch does not fix the uname -m issue - to do so
> > Andreas' patch is needed.
> >
> > Sam
>
> Linus,
>
> The issue Sam refers to is that
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 03:37:31PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> Note: This patch does not fix the uname -m issue - to do so
> Andreas' patch is needed.
>
> Sam
Linus,
The issue Sam refers to is that UTS_MACHINE is set to "x86" instead of
"i386" or "x86_64" when building with ARCH=x86.
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 03:37:31PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
Note: This patch does not fix the uname -m issue - to do so
Andreas' patch is needed.
Sam
Linus,
The issue Sam refers to is that UTS_MACHINE is set to x86 instead of
i386 or x86_64 when building with ARCH=x86. Thus the
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 10:34:37AM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 03:37:31PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
Note: This patch does not fix the uname -m issue - to do so
Andreas' patch is needed.
Sam
Linus,
The issue Sam refers to is that UTS_MACHINE is set
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 11:41:29AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 10:34:37AM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 03:37:31PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
Note: This patch does not fix the uname -m issue - to do so
Andreas' patch is needed.
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 08:57:15AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > >
> > >Any good suggestions here???
> > >UTS_MACHINE is set in top-level Makefile and if we specify
> > >make ARCH=x86
> > >we do not know if i386 or x86_&4 is correct until the configuration
> > >has been read.
> > >
> > >Should we
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 08:57:15AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
Any good suggestions here???
UTS_MACHINE is set in top-level Makefile and if we specify
make ARCH=x86
we do not know if i386 or x86_4 is correct until the configuration
has been read.
Should we report a make ARCH=x86
8 matches
Mail list logo