Re: [PATCH] x86: fix UTS_MACHINE to be i386 for 32-bit build and x86_64 for 64-bit build

2007-11-19 Thread Andreas Herrmann
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 11:41:29AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 10:34:37AM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 03:37:31PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > > > > Note: This patch does not fix the uname -m issue - to do so > > > Andreas' patch is

Re: [PATCH] x86: fix UTS_MACHINE to be i386 for 32-bit build and x86_64 for 64-bit build

2007-11-19 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 10:34:37AM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote: > On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 03:37:31PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > > Note: This patch does not fix the uname -m issue - to do so > > Andreas' patch is needed. > > > > Sam > > Linus, > > The issue Sam refers to is that

[PATCH] x86: fix UTS_MACHINE to be i386 for 32-bit build and x86_64 for 64-bit build

2007-11-19 Thread Andreas Herrmann
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 03:37:31PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > Note: This patch does not fix the uname -m issue - to do so > Andreas' patch is needed. > > Sam Linus, The issue Sam refers to is that UTS_MACHINE is set to "x86" instead of "i386" or "x86_64" when building with ARCH=x86.

[PATCH] x86: fix UTS_MACHINE to be i386 for 32-bit build and x86_64 for 64-bit build

2007-11-19 Thread Andreas Herrmann
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 03:37:31PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: Note: This patch does not fix the uname -m issue - to do so Andreas' patch is needed. Sam Linus, The issue Sam refers to is that UTS_MACHINE is set to x86 instead of i386 or x86_64 when building with ARCH=x86. Thus the

Re: [PATCH] x86: fix UTS_MACHINE to be i386 for 32-bit build and x86_64 for 64-bit build

2007-11-19 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 10:34:37AM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote: On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 03:37:31PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: Note: This patch does not fix the uname -m issue - to do so Andreas' patch is needed. Sam Linus, The issue Sam refers to is that UTS_MACHINE is set

Re: [PATCH] x86: fix UTS_MACHINE to be i386 for 32-bit build and x86_64 for 64-bit build

2007-11-19 Thread Andreas Herrmann
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 11:41:29AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 10:34:37AM +0100, Andreas Herrmann wrote: On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 03:37:31PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: Note: This patch does not fix the uname -m issue - to do so Andreas' patch is needed.

[PATCH] x86: fix UTS_MACHINE to be "i386" for 32-bit build and "x86_64" for 64-bit build

2007-11-17 Thread Andreas Herrmann
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 08:57:15AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > > > >Any good suggestions here??? > > >UTS_MACHINE is set in top-level Makefile and if we specify > > >make ARCH=x86 > > >we do not know if i386 or x86_&4 is correct until the configuration > > >has been read. > > > > > >Should we

[PATCH] x86: fix UTS_MACHINE to be i386 for 32-bit build and x86_64 for 64-bit build

2007-11-17 Thread Andreas Herrmann
On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 08:57:15AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: Any good suggestions here??? UTS_MACHINE is set in top-level Makefile and if we specify make ARCH=x86 we do not know if i386 or x86_4 is correct until the configuration has been read. Should we report a make ARCH=x86