Re: [PATCH] x86: trivial whitespace in kprobes.c

2008-01-10 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Harvey Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > Ingo, you could/should probably fold this into Masami's kprobe > unification patch. i applied this as a separate patch - better for whitespace changes to not be mixed into unification patch

Re: [PATCH] x86: trivial whitespace in kprobes.c

2008-01-10 Thread Masami Hiramatsu
Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > Harvey Harrison wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> --- >> Ingo, you could/should probably fold this into Masami's kprobe >> unification patch. > > The original code had these whitespace, b

Re: [PATCH] x86: trivial whitespace in kprobes.c

2008-01-10 Thread Masami Hiramatsu
Harvey Harrison wrote: > Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > Ingo, you could/should probably fold this into Masami's kprobe > unification patch. The original code had these whitespace, because (I think) kretprobe_trampoline_ho

[PATCH] x86: trivial whitespace in kprobes.c

2008-01-10 Thread Harvey Harrison
Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Ingo, you could/should probably fold this into Masami's kprobe unification patch. commit 17735e04f7f18bea4dcbe4daa31c34acac55b332 Author: Masami Hiramatsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed Jan 9 13:30:50 2008 +0100 kprobes code for x86 unif