On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:08:45AM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> The work performed by wmi_gtoa is equivalent to simply sprintf(out,
> "%pUL", in), so one could replace its body by this. However, most
> users feed the result directly as a %s argument to some other function
> which also understan
The work performed by wmi_gtoa is equivalent to simply sprintf(out,
"%pUL", in), so one could replace its body by this. However, most
users feed the result directly as a %s argument to some other function
which also understands the %p extensions (they all ultimately use
vsnprintf), so we can elimin
On Fri, Mar 06 2015, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:15:30PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>> The work performed by wmi_gtoa is equivalent to simply sprintf(out,
>> "%pUL", in), so one could replace its body by this. However, most
>> users feed the result directly as a %s argumen
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:15:30PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> The work performed by wmi_gtoa is equivalent to simply sprintf(out,
> "%pUL", in), so one could replace its body by this. However, most
> users feed the result directly as a %s argument to some other function
> which also understan
The work performed by wmi_gtoa is equivalent to simply sprintf(out,
"%pUL", in), so one could replace its body by this. However, most
users feed the result directly as a %s argument to some other function
which also understands the %p extensions (they all ultimately use
vsnprintf), so we can elimin
5 matches
Mail list logo