Re: [PATCH] xfrm/compat: Remove use of kmalloc_track_caller

2020-11-01 Thread Alistair Delva
On Sun, Nov 1, 2020 at 7:39 PM Herbert Xu wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 01, 2020 at 02:08:45PM -0800, Alistair Delva wrote: > > The __kmalloc_track_caller symbol is not exported if SLUB/SLOB are > > enabled instead of SLAB, which breaks the build on such configs when > > CONFIG_XFRM_USER_COMPAT=m. > > > >

Re: [PATCH] xfrm/compat: Remove use of kmalloc_track_caller

2020-11-01 Thread Herbert Xu
On Sun, Nov 01, 2020 at 02:08:45PM -0800, Alistair Delva wrote: > The __kmalloc_track_caller symbol is not exported if SLUB/SLOB are > enabled instead of SLAB, which breaks the build on such configs when > CONFIG_XFRM_USER_COMPAT=m. > > ERROR: "__kmalloc_track_caller" [net/xfrm/xfrm_compat.ko] und

Re: [PATCH] xfrm/compat: Remove use of kmalloc_track_caller

2020-11-01 Thread Dmitry Safonov
On 11/1/20 10:08 PM, Alistair Delva wrote: > The __kmalloc_track_caller symbol is not exported if SLUB/SLOB are > enabled instead of SLAB, which breaks the build on such configs when > CONFIG_XFRM_USER_COMPAT=m. > > ERROR: "__kmalloc_track_caller" [net/xfrm/xfrm_compat.ko] undefined! > > Other us

[PATCH] xfrm/compat: Remove use of kmalloc_track_caller

2020-11-01 Thread Alistair Delva
The __kmalloc_track_caller symbol is not exported if SLUB/SLOB are enabled instead of SLAB, which breaks the build on such configs when CONFIG_XFRM_USER_COMPAT=m. ERROR: "__kmalloc_track_caller" [net/xfrm/xfrm_compat.ko] undefined! Other users of this symbol are 'bool' options, but changing this