2018-01-03 4:38 GMT+08:00 Darrick J. Wong :
> On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 08:34:47PM +0800, Xiongwei Song wrote:
>> The mutex qi_tree_lock of xfs_quotainfo_t object was initialized when
>> calling xfs_qm_init_quotainfo, but it was not destroyed before free
>> xfs_quotainfo_t
2018-01-03 4:38 GMT+08:00 Darrick J. Wong :
> On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 08:34:47PM +0800, Xiongwei Song wrote:
>> The mutex qi_tree_lock of xfs_quotainfo_t object was initialized when
>> calling xfs_qm_init_quotainfo, but it was not destroyed before free
>> xfs_quotainfo_t object when calling
On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 08:34:47PM +0800, Xiongwei Song wrote:
> The mutex qi_tree_lock of xfs_quotainfo_t object was initialized when
> calling xfs_qm_init_quotainfo, but it was not destroyed before free
> xfs_quotainfo_t object when calling xfs_qm_destroy_quotainfo, this was
> incorrect, so
On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 08:34:47PM +0800, Xiongwei Song wrote:
> The mutex qi_tree_lock of xfs_quotainfo_t object was initialized when
> calling xfs_qm_init_quotainfo, but it was not destroyed before free
> xfs_quotainfo_t object when calling xfs_qm_destroy_quotainfo, this was
> incorrect, so
The mutex qi_tree_lock of xfs_quotainfo_t object was initialized when
calling xfs_qm_init_quotainfo, but it was not destroyed before free
xfs_quotainfo_t object when calling xfs_qm_destroy_quotainfo, this was
incorrect, so destroy it in function xfs_qm_destroy_quotainfo.
Signed-off-by: Xiongwei
The mutex qi_tree_lock of xfs_quotainfo_t object was initialized when
calling xfs_qm_init_quotainfo, but it was not destroyed before free
xfs_quotainfo_t object when calling xfs_qm_destroy_quotainfo, this was
incorrect, so destroy it in function xfs_qm_destroy_quotainfo.
Signed-off-by: Xiongwei
6 matches
Mail list logo