Re: [PATCH] xhci: fix 'broken_suspend' placement in struct xchi_hcd

2018-12-17 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 03:59:28PM +0200, Mathias Nyman wrote: > On 17.12.2018 15:37, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: > > As commented in the struct's definition there shouldn't be anything > > underneath it's 'priv[0]' member as it would break some macros. > > > > The patch converts the broken_susp

Re: [PATCH] xhci: fix 'broken_suspend' placement in struct xchi_hcd

2018-12-17 Thread Mathias Nyman
On 17.12.2018 15:37, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote: As commented in the struct's definition there shouldn't be anything underneath it's 'priv[0]' member as it would break some macros. The patch converts the broken_suspend into a bit-field and relocates it next to to the rest of bit-fields. Fixes

Re: [PATCH] xhci: fix 'broken_suspend' placement in struct xchi_hcd

2018-12-17 Thread Felipe Balbi
Nicolas Saenz Julienne writes: > As commented in the struct's definition there shouldn't be anything > underneath it's 'priv[0]' member as it would break some macros. its? I guess Mathias can fix when applying. -- balbi signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[PATCH] xhci: fix 'broken_suspend' placement in struct xchi_hcd

2018-12-17 Thread Nicolas Saenz Julienne
As commented in the struct's definition there shouldn't be anything underneath it's 'priv[0]' member as it would break some macros. The patch converts the broken_suspend into a bit-field and relocates it next to to the rest of bit-fields. Fixes: a7d57abcc8a5 ("xhci: workaround CSS timeout on AMD