On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, safemode wrote:
> [where to get the VM patch]
http://www.surriel.com/patches/
Rik
--
"What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!"
-- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000
http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Martin Josefsson wrote:
> > I've been trying to get my machine to swap but that seems hard with this
> > new patch :) I have 0kB of swap used after 8h uptime, and I have been
> > compiling, moving files between partitions and running md5sum on files
> > (that was a big
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Martin Josefsson wrote:
> > I've been trying to get my machine to swap but that seems hard with this
> > new patch :) I have 0kB of swap used after 8h uptime, and I have been
> > compiling, moving files between partitions and running md5sum on files
> >
Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Martin Josefsson wrote:
> > I've been trying to get my machine to swap but that seems hard with this
> > new patch :) I have 0kB of swap used after 8h uptime, and I have been
> > compiling, moving files between partitions and running md5sum on files
> > (that was a big
Martin Josefsson wrote:
> I've been trying to get my machine to swap but that seems hard with this
> new patch :) I have 0kB of swap used after 8h uptime, and I have been
> compiling, moving files between partitions and running md5sum on files
> (that was a big problem before, everything ended up
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, David S. Miller wrote:
>
> > In page_launder() about halfway down there is this sequence of tests
> > on LRU pages:
> >
> > if (!clearedbuf) {
> > ...
> > } else if (!page->mapping) {
> > ...
> > } else if (page_count(page) > 1)
Jamie Lokier wrote:
Martin Josefsson wrote:
I've been trying to get my machine to swap but that seems hard with this
new patch :) I have 0kB of swap used after 8h uptime, and I have been
compiling, moving files between partitions and running md5sum on files
(that was a big problem
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, safemode wrote:
[where to get the VM patch]
http://www.surriel.com/patches/
Rik
--
"What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!"
-- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000
http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
Martin Josefsson wrote:
I've been trying to get my machine to swap but that seems hard with this
new patch :) I have 0kB of swap used after 8h uptime, and I have been
compiling, moving files between partitions and running md5sum on files
(that was a big problem before, everything ended up on
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Jamie Lokier wrote:
Martin Josefsson wrote:
I've been trying to get my machine to swap but that seems hard with this
new patch :) I have 0kB of swap used after 8h uptime, and I have been
compiling, moving files between partitions and running md5sum on files
(that was
Jamie Lokier wrote:
Martin Josefsson wrote:
I've been trying to get my machine to swap but that seems hard with this
new patch :) I have 0kB of swap used after 8h uptime, and I have been
compiling, moving files between partitions and running md5sum on files
(that was a big problem
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, David S. Miller wrote:
>
> > In page_launder() about halfway down there is this sequence of tests
> > on LRU pages:
> >
> > } else if (page_count(page) > 1) {
> > } else /* page->mapping && page_count(page) == 1 */ {
>
> Indeed,
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, David S. Miller wrote:
> In page_launder() about halfway down there is this sequence of tests
> on LRU pages:
>
> if (!clearedbuf) {
> ...
> } else if (!page->mapping) {
> ...
> } else if (page_count(page) > 1) {
> } else /* page->mapping && page_count(page) == 1 */ {
>
From: "Juan J. Quintela" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 14 Sep 2000 08:11:40 +0200
I can only see one place where we add a page to the page cache and
we don't increase its page count, and it is in grow_buffers().
Could somebody explain me _why_ we don't need to do a
> "david" == David S Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
david> In page_launder() about halfway down there is this sequence of tests
david> on LRU pages:
david> if (!clearedbuf) {
david> ...
david> } else if (!page->mapping) {
david> ...
david> } else if (page_count(page) > 1) {
david> }
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, David S. Miller wrote:
In page_launder() about halfway down there is this sequence of tests
on LRU pages:
if (!clearedbuf) {
...
} else if (!page-mapping) {
...
} else if (page_count(page) 1) {
} else /* page-mapping page_count(page) == 1 */ {
...
}
Above
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, David S. Miller wrote:
In page_launder() about halfway down there is this sequence of tests
on LRU pages:
} else if (page_count(page) 1) {
} else /* page-mapping page_count(page) == 1 */ {
Indeed, you're right. This
"david" == David S Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
david In page_launder() about halfway down there is this sequence of tests
david on LRU pages:
david if (!clearedbuf) {
david ...
david } else if (!page-mapping) {
david ...
david } else if (page_count(page) 1) {
david } else /*
In page_launder() about halfway down there is this sequence of tests
on LRU pages:
if (!clearedbuf) {
...
} else if (!page->mapping) {
...
} else if (page_count(page) > 1) {
} else /* page->mapping && page_count(page) == 1 */ {
...
}
Above this sequence we've done a page_cache_get. For the
Hi,
The new VM patch seems has received a major amount of
code cleanup, performance tuning and stability improvement
over the last few days and is now almost production
quality, with the following 4 items left for 2.4:
- improve streaming IO performance
- out of memory handling
- integrate Ben
In page_launder() about halfway down there is this sequence of tests
on LRU pages:
if (!clearedbuf) {
...
} else if (!page-mapping) {
...
} else if (page_count(page) 1) {
} else /* page-mapping page_count(page) == 1 */ {
...
}
Above this sequence we've done a page_cache_get. For the
21 matches
Mail list logo
