Re: [PATCH -next] xen/pvcalls: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock

2018-01-02 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 12/27/2017 10:46 PM, Wei Yongjun wrote: > A spin lock is taken here so we should use GFP_ATOMIC. > > Fixes: 9774c6cca266 ("xen/pvcalls: implement accept command") > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun Applied to for-linus-4.15 -boris

Re: [PATCH -next] xen/pvcalls: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock

2018-01-02 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 12/27/2017 10:46 PM, Wei Yongjun wrote: > A spin lock is taken here so we should use GFP_ATOMIC. > > Fixes: 9774c6cca266 ("xen/pvcalls: implement accept command") > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun Applied to for-linus-4.15 -boris

Re: [PATCH -next] xen/pvcalls: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock

2018-01-02 Thread Juergen Gross
On 28/12/17 04:46, Wei Yongjun wrote: > A spin lock is taken here so we should use GFP_ATOMIC. > > Fixes: 9774c6cca266 ("xen/pvcalls: implement accept command") > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross Juergen

Re: [PATCH -next] xen/pvcalls: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock

2018-01-02 Thread Juergen Gross
On 28/12/17 04:46, Wei Yongjun wrote: > A spin lock is taken here so we should use GFP_ATOMIC. > > Fixes: 9774c6cca266 ("xen/pvcalls: implement accept command") > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross Juergen

[PATCH -next] xen/pvcalls: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock

2017-12-27 Thread Wei Yongjun
A spin lock is taken here so we should use GFP_ATOMIC. Fixes: 9774c6cca266 ("xen/pvcalls: implement accept command") Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun --- drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c

[PATCH -next] xen/pvcalls: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin lock

2017-12-27 Thread Wei Yongjun
A spin lock is taken here so we should use GFP_ATOMIC. Fixes: 9774c6cca266 ("xen/pvcalls: implement accept command") Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun --- drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c