Re: [PATCH -next 0/3] sysvipc: introduce STAT_ALL commands

2018-02-13 Thread Davidlohr Bueso
On Tue, 13 Feb 2018, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 09:41:33 -0800 Davidlohr Bueso wrote: Hi, The following patches adds the discussed[1] new command for shm as well as for sems and msq as they are subject to the same discrepancies for ipc object permission

Re: [PATCH -next 0/3] sysvipc: introduce STAT_ALL commands

2018-02-13 Thread Davidlohr Bueso
On Tue, 13 Feb 2018, Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 09:41:33 -0800 Davidlohr Bueso wrote: Hi, The following patches adds the discussed[1] new command for shm as well as for sems and msq as they are subject to the same discrepancies for ipc object permission checks between the

Re: [PATCH -next 0/3] sysvipc: introduce STAT_ALL commands

2018-02-13 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 09:41:33 -0800 Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > Hi, > > The following patches adds the discussed[1] new command for shm > as well as for sems and msq as they are subject to the same discrepancies > for ipc object permission checks between the syscall and via

Re: [PATCH -next 0/3] sysvipc: introduce STAT_ALL commands

2018-02-13 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 13 Feb 2018 09:41:33 -0800 Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > Hi, > > The following patches adds the discussed[1] new command for shm > as well as for sems and msq as they are subject to the same discrepancies > for ipc object permission checks between the syscall and via procfs. > These new

Re: [PATCH -next 0/3] sysvipc: introduce STAT_ALL commands

2018-02-13 Thread Davidlohr Bueso
On Tue, 13 Feb 2018, Eric W. Biederman wrote: Davidlohr Bueso writes: Hi, The following patches adds the discussed[1] new command for shm as well as for sems and msq as they are subject to the same discrepancies for ipc object permission checks between the syscall and via

Re: [PATCH -next 0/3] sysvipc: introduce STAT_ALL commands

2018-02-13 Thread Davidlohr Bueso
On Tue, 13 Feb 2018, Eric W. Biederman wrote: Davidlohr Bueso writes: Hi, The following patches adds the discussed[1] new command for shm as well as for sems and msq as they are subject to the same discrepancies for ipc object permission checks between the syscall and via procfs. These new

Re: [PATCH -next 0/3] sysvipc: introduce STAT_ALL commands

2018-02-13 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Davidlohr Bueso writes: > Hi, > > The following patches adds the discussed[1] new command for shm > as well as for sems and msq as they are subject to the same discrepancies > for ipc object permission checks between the syscall and via procfs. > These new commands are

Re: [PATCH -next 0/3] sysvipc: introduce STAT_ALL commands

2018-02-13 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Davidlohr Bueso writes: > Hi, > > The following patches adds the discussed[1] new command for shm > as well as for sems and msq as they are subject to the same discrepancies > for ipc object permission checks between the syscall and via procfs. > These new commands are justified in that (1) we

[PATCH -next 0/3] sysvipc: introduce STAT_ALL commands

2018-02-13 Thread Davidlohr Bueso
Hi, The following patches adds the discussed[1] new command for shm as well as for sems and msq as they are subject to the same discrepancies for ipc object permission checks between the syscall and via procfs. These new commands are justified in that (1) we are stuck with this semantics as

[PATCH -next 0/3] sysvipc: introduce STAT_ALL commands

2018-02-13 Thread Davidlohr Bueso
Hi, The following patches adds the discussed[1] new command for shm as well as for sems and msq as they are subject to the same discrepancies for ipc object permission checks between the syscall and via procfs. These new commands are justified in that (1) we are stuck with this semantics as