On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 04:47:36PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 04:42:29PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > This changelog doesn't have the nifty test case code which was in
> > earlier versions?
>
> Why do we put regression tests in the changelogs anyway? We have
>
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 04:47:36PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 04:42:29PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > This changelog doesn't have the nifty test case code which was in
> > earlier versions?
>
> Why do we put regression tests in the changelogs anyway? We have
>
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 04:42:29PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> This changelog doesn't have the nifty test case code which was in
> earlier versions?
Why do we put regression tests in the changelogs anyway? We have
tools/testing/selftests/vm/ already, perhaps they should go there?
On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 04:42:29PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> This changelog doesn't have the nifty test case code which was in
> earlier versions?
Why do we put regression tests in the changelogs anyway? We have
tools/testing/selftests/vm/ already, perhaps they should go there?
On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 15:09:06 -0800 Joel Fernandes
wrote:
> Android uses ashmem for sharing memory regions. We are looking forward to
> migrating all usecases of ashmem to memfd so that we can possibly remove
> the ashmem driver in the future from staging while also benefiting from
> using
On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 15:09:06 -0800 Joel Fernandes
wrote:
> Android uses ashmem for sharing memory regions. We are looking forward to
> migrating all usecases of ashmem to memfd so that we can possibly remove
> the ashmem driver in the future from staging while also benefiting from
> using
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 07:25:26PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 6:27 PM Andrew Morton
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:13:35 -0800 Joel Fernandes
> > wrote:
> >
> > > > > I am Ok with whatever Andrew wants to do, if it is better to squash
> > > > > it with
>
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 07:25:26PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 6:27 PM Andrew Morton
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:13:35 -0800 Joel Fernandes
> > wrote:
> >
> > > > > I am Ok with whatever Andrew wants to do, if it is better to squash
> > > > > it with
>
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 6:27 PM Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:13:35 -0800 Joel Fernandes
> wrote:
>
> > > > I am Ok with whatever Andrew wants to do, if it is better to squash it
> > > > with
> > > > the original, then I can do that and send another patch.
> > > >
> > > >
> >
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 6:27 PM Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:13:35 -0800 Joel Fernandes
> wrote:
>
> > > > I am Ok with whatever Andrew wants to do, if it is better to squash it
> > > > with
> > > > the original, then I can do that and send another patch.
> > > >
> > > >
> >
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:13:35 -0800 Joel Fernandes
wrote:
> > > I am Ok with whatever Andrew wants to do, if it is better to squash it
> > > with
> > > the original, then I can do that and send another patch.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > From experience, Andrew will food in fixups on request :)
>
>
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:13:35 -0800 Joel Fernandes
wrote:
> > > I am Ok with whatever Andrew wants to do, if it is better to squash it
> > > with
> > > the original, then I can do that and send another patch.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > From experience, Andrew will food in fixups on request :)
>
>
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 02:02:49PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> > On Nov 20, 2018, at 1:47 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 01:33:18PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Nov 20, 2018, at 1:07 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Joel,
>
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 02:02:49PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> > On Nov 20, 2018, at 1:47 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 01:33:18PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Nov 20, 2018, at 1:07 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Joel,
>
> On Nov 20, 2018, at 1:47 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 01:33:18PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 20, 2018, at 1:07 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Joel,
>>>
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 10:39:26 -0800 Joel Fernandes
> wrote:
>
> On
> On Nov 20, 2018, at 1:47 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 01:33:18PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 20, 2018, at 1:07 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Joel,
>>>
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 10:39:26 -0800 Joel Fernandes
> wrote:
>
> On
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 01:33:18PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> > On Nov 20, 2018, at 1:07 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > Hi Joel,
> >
> >> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 10:39:26 -0800 Joel Fernandes
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 07:13:17AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 01:33:18PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> > On Nov 20, 2018, at 1:07 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > Hi Joel,
> >
> >> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 10:39:26 -0800 Joel Fernandes
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 07:13:17AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> On Nov 20, 2018, at 1:07 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi Joel,
>
>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 10:39:26 -0800 Joel Fernandes
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 07:13:17AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 9:21 PM Joel Fernandes (Google)
>>> wrote:
> On Nov 20, 2018, at 1:07 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi Joel,
>
>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 10:39:26 -0800 Joel Fernandes
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 07:13:17AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 9:21 PM Joel Fernandes (Google)
>>> wrote:
Hi Joel,
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 10:39:26 -0800 Joel Fernandes
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 07:13:17AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 9:21 PM Joel Fernandes (Google)
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > A better way to do F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal was discussed [1] last week
>
Hi Joel,
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 10:39:26 -0800 Joel Fernandes
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 07:13:17AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 9:21 PM Joel Fernandes (Google)
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > A better way to do F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal was discussed [1] last week
>
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 07:13:17AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 9:21 PM Joel Fernandes (Google)
> wrote:
> >
> > A better way to do F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal was discussed [1] last week
> > where we don't need to modify core VFS structures to get the same
> > behavior of
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 07:13:17AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 9:21 PM Joel Fernandes (Google)
> wrote:
> >
> > A better way to do F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal was discussed [1] last week
> > where we don't need to modify core VFS structures to get the same
> > behavior of
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 9:21 PM Joel Fernandes (Google)
wrote:
>
> A better way to do F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal was discussed [1] last week
> where we don't need to modify core VFS structures to get the same
> behavior of the seal. This solves several side-effects pointed out by
> Andy [2].
>
>
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 9:21 PM Joel Fernandes (Google)
wrote:
>
> A better way to do F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal was discussed [1] last week
> where we don't need to modify core VFS structures to get the same
> behavior of the seal. This solves several side-effects pointed out by
> Andy [2].
>
>
A better way to do F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal was discussed [1] last week
where we don't need to modify core VFS structures to get the same
behavior of the seal. This solves several side-effects pointed out by
Andy [2].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2018173650.ga256...@google.com/
[2]
A better way to do F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal was discussed [1] last week
where we don't need to modify core VFS structures to get the same
behavior of the seal. This solves several side-effects pointed out by
Andy [2].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2018173650.ga256...@google.com/
[2]
28 matches
Mail list logo