On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 10:27 +1100, Ryan Mallon wrote:
> On 11/12/13 16:12, Joe Perches wrote:
> > seq_printf and seq_puts returns are often misused.
> >
> > Instead of checking the seq_printf or seq_puts return,
> > add a new seq_overflow function to test if a seq_file has
> > overflowed the
On 11/12/13 16:12, Joe Perches wrote:
> seq_printf and seq_puts returns are often misused.
>
> Instead of checking the seq_printf or seq_puts return,
> add a new seq_overflow function to test if a seq_file has
> overflowed the available buffer space.
>
> This will eventually allow seq_printf and
On 11/12/13 16:12, Joe Perches wrote:
seq_printf and seq_puts returns are often misused.
Instead of checking the seq_printf or seq_puts return,
add a new seq_overflow function to test if a seq_file has
overflowed the available buffer space.
This will eventually allow seq_printf and
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 10:27 +1100, Ryan Mallon wrote:
On 11/12/13 16:12, Joe Perches wrote:
seq_printf and seq_puts returns are often misused.
Instead of checking the seq_printf or seq_puts return,
add a new seq_overflow function to test if a seq_file has
overflowed the available
seq_printf and seq_puts returns are often misused.
Instead of checking the seq_printf or seq_puts return,
add a new seq_overflow function to test if a seq_file has
overflowed the available buffer space.
This will eventually allow seq_printf and seq_puts to be
converted to have a void return
seq_printf and seq_puts returns are often misused.
Instead of checking the seq_printf or seq_puts return,
add a new seq_overflow function to test if a seq_file has
overflowed the available buffer space.
This will eventually allow seq_printf and seq_puts to be
converted to have a void return
6 matches
Mail list logo
