Re: [PATCH -tip 0/2] kprobes/x86: Fix bugs for NMI handling

2014-02-23 Thread Masami Hiramatsu
Hi Ingo, Should I resend this series to your kernel.org address? Thank you, (2014/02/20 12:39), Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > The following series fixes bugs hidden in the ancient code. > > The bugs suddenly appeared when I enabled over 6,000 kprobes > and ran perf-top with --call-graph. The bugs

Re: [PATCH -tip 0/2] kprobes/x86: Fix bugs for NMI handling

2014-02-23 Thread Masami Hiramatsu
Hi Ingo, Should I resend this series to your kernel.org address? Thank you, (2014/02/20 12:39), Masami Hiramatsu wrote: The following series fixes bugs hidden in the ancient code. The bugs suddenly appeared when I enabled over 6,000 kprobes and ran perf-top with --call-graph. The bugs are

[PATCH -tip 0/2] kprobes/x86: Fix bugs for NMI handling

2014-02-19 Thread Masami Hiramatsu
The following series fixes bugs hidden in the ancient code. The bugs suddenly appeared when I enabled over 6,000 kprobes and ran perf-top with --call-graph. The bugs are hidden in the old code and it have woken up by real stress testing. Actually, current kprobes doesn't expect an NMI handler

[PATCH -tip 0/2] kprobes/x86: Fix bugs for NMI handling

2014-02-19 Thread Masami Hiramatsu
The following series fixes bugs hidden in the ancient code. The bugs suddenly appeared when I enabled over 6,000 kprobes and ran perf-top with --call-graph. The bugs are hidden in the old code and it have woken up by real stress testing. Actually, current kprobes doesn't expect an NMI handler