On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 11:55:22AM -0500, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:31:39AM +1100, Singh, Balbir wrote:
> > On 18/11/20 10:19 am, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > > From: Peter Zijlstra
> > >
> > > In preparation of playing games with rq->lock, abstract the thing
> > >
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 10:31:39AM +1100, Singh, Balbir wrote:
> On 18/11/20 10:19 am, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > From: Peter Zijlstra
> >
> > In preparation of playing games with rq->lock, abstract the thing
> > using an accessor.
> >
>
> Could you clarify games? I presume the
On 18/11/20 10:19 am, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> From: Peter Zijlstra
>
> In preparation of playing games with rq->lock, abstract the thing
> using an accessor.
>
Could you clarify games? I presume the intention is to redefine the scope of
the lock based on whether core sched is enabled
From: Peter Zijlstra
In preparation of playing games with rq->lock, abstract the thing
using an accessor.
Tested-by: Julien Desfossez
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
Signed-off-by: Vineeth Remanan Pillai
Signed-off-by: Julien Desfossez
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google)
---
4 matches
Mail list logo