(2013/12/24 17:46), Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Dec 2013 17:27:45 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> (2013/12/24 16:54), Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>> Hi Masami,
>>>
>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 19:50:10 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
(2013/12/23 16:46), Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Dec 2013
On Tue, 24 Dec 2013 17:27:45 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2013/12/24 16:54), Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> Hi Masami,
>>
>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 19:50:10 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>>> (2013/12/23 16:46), Namhyung Kim wrote:
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:54:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
(2013/12/24 16:54), Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Masami,
>
> On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 19:50:10 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> (2013/12/23 16:46), Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:54:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
(2013/12/21 3:03), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Dec
(2013/12/24 16:54), Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Masami,
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 19:50:10 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
(2013/12/23 16:46), Namhyung Kim wrote:
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:54:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
(2013/12/21 3:03), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at
On Tue, 24 Dec 2013 17:27:45 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
(2013/12/24 16:54), Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Masami,
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 19:50:10 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
(2013/12/23 16:46), Namhyung Kim wrote:
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:54:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
(2013/12/21 3:03),
(2013/12/24 17:46), Namhyung Kim wrote:
On Tue, 24 Dec 2013 17:27:45 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
(2013/12/24 16:54), Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hi Masami,
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 19:50:10 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
(2013/12/23 16:46), Namhyung Kim wrote:
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:54:38 +0900,
Hi Masami,
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 19:50:10 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2013/12/23 16:46), Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:54:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>>> (2013/12/21 3:03), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:03:02AM +, Masami Hiramatsu
(2013/12/23 16:46), Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:54:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> (2013/12/21 3:03), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>> Em Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:03:02AM +, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
>> BTW, I'm not sure why debuginfo and nm shows symbol address +
(2013/12/23 16:46), Namhyung Kim wrote:
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:54:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
(2013/12/21 3:03), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:03:02AM +, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
BTW, I'm not sure why debuginfo and nm shows symbol address + 0x40,
Hi Masami,
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 19:50:10 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
(2013/12/23 16:46), Namhyung Kim wrote:
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:54:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
(2013/12/21 3:03), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:03:02AM +, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:54:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2013/12/21 3:03), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> Em Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:03:02AM +, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> BTW, I'm not sure why debuginfo and nm shows symbol address + 0x40,
> and why the perf's map/symbol can
(2013/12/21 3:03), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:03:02AM +, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
>> Use the actual address of tracepoint as a hint to find
>> different local symbols. Since sometimes there are local
>> symbols which have same name, it is impossible to
(2013/12/21 3:03), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:03:02AM +, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
Use the actual address of tracepoint as a hint to find
different local symbols. Since sometimes there are local
symbols which have same name, it is impossible to determine
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:54:38 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
(2013/12/21 3:03), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:03:02AM +, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
BTW, I'm not sure why debuginfo and nm shows symbol address + 0x40,
and why the perf's map/symbol can remove
Em Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:03:02AM +, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> Use the actual address of tracepoint as a hint to find
> different local symbols. Since sometimes there are local
> symbols which have same name, it is impossible to determine
> which symbol should be used. This saves the
Use the actual address of tracepoint as a hint to find
different local symbols. Since sometimes there are local
symbols which have same name, it is impossible to determine
which symbol should be used. This saves the actual address
from debuginfo and use it as a hint later.
The reason why we don't
Use the actual address of tracepoint as a hint to find
different local symbols. Since sometimes there are local
symbols which have same name, it is impossible to determine
which symbol should be used. This saves the actual address
from debuginfo and use it as a hint later.
The reason why we don't
Em Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:03:02AM +, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
Use the actual address of tracepoint as a hint to find
different local symbols. Since sometimes there are local
symbols which have same name, it is impossible to determine
which symbol should be used. This saves the actual
18 matches
Mail list logo