Hi Andrew,
thanks for taking a look.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 01:29:36PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Why? What's driving this? What are the benefits to our users? Are
> there any downsides or back-compatibility issues?
>
> I see from the code that this is not actually enabled by default.
Hi Andrew,
thanks for taking a look.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 01:29:36PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Why? What's driving this? What are the benefits to our users? Are
> there any downsides or back-compatibility issues?
>
> I see from the code that this is not actually enabled by default.
On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 11:18:49 +0200 Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov
>
> Extend the ratelimiting facility to print the amount of suppressed lines
> when it is being released.
Why? What's driving this? What are the benefits to our users? Are
there
On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 11:18:49 +0200 Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov
>
> Extend the ratelimiting facility to print the amount of suppressed lines
> when it is being released.
Why? What's driving this? What are the benefits to our users? Are
there any downsides or
From: Borislav Petkov
Extend the ratelimiting facility to print the amount of suppressed lines
when it is being released.
Separated from a previous patch by Linus.
Also, make the ON_RELEASE image not use "callbacks" as it is misleading.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov
From: Borislav Petkov
Extend the ratelimiting facility to print the amount of suppressed lines
when it is being released.
Separated from a previous patch by Linus.
Also, make the ON_RELEASE image not use "callbacks" as it is misleading.
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov
Cc: Andrew Morton
Cc:
6 matches
Mail list logo